[1]周长军,田中艳,吴耀坤,等.不同生态环境抗线虫大豆品种综合性状分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(06):1-5.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.06.0001]
　ZHOU Chang-jun,TIAN Zhong-yan,WU Yao-kun,et al.Analysis on Comprehensive Traits of Resistant NematodeSoybean Varieties in Different Ecological Environments[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(06):1-5.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.06.0001]
点击复制

不同生态环境抗线虫大豆品种综合性状分析

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2022年06 页码: 1-5 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-06-10
Title:
Analysis on Comprehensive Traits of Resistant NematodeSoybean Varieties in Different Ecological Environments
作者:
周长军; 田中艳; 吴耀坤; 于吉东; 马兰; 李建英; 刘冰; 李肖白
黑龙江省农业科学院 大庆分院/国家大豆产业技术体系大庆综合试验站，黑龙江 大庆 163316
Author(s):
ZHOU Chang-jun; TIAN Zhong-yan; WU Yao-kun; YU Ji-dong; MA Lan; LI Jian-ying; LIU Bing; LI Xiao-bai
Daqing Branch,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Daqing Comprehensive Experimental Station of National Soybean Industry Technology System,Daqing 163316,China
关键词:
大豆; 抗线虫品种; 产量稳定性; AMMI模型; DTOPSIS法
Keywords:
soybean;  nematode resistant variety;  yield stability;  AMMI model;  DTOPSIS method
DOI:
DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.06.0001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究抗线虫大豆品种(系)在不同生态环境的产量表现规律及综合性状表现，并对其作出客观合理的综合性评价，本研究采用AMMI模型分析10个抗线虫大豆品种(系)在2015-2016年5点试验数据中的品种基因型与环境互作情况，用DTOPSIS法分析品种综合性状，观察不同品种(系)的表现。结果表明：AMMI模型参数分析试验数据得出，品种G1、G3稳定性参数Di值较小，说明其遗传稳定性好，品种G4、G7、G8稳定性参数 Di值较大，稳定性差。DTOPSIS法分析各品种综合性状数据得出，品种G1与理想品种综合性状值的相对接近度Ci值为0.612 3(2015年)和0.702 0(2016年)，在参试品种综合性状分析中排在第1位，G2排名3~8位，G3排名1~4位，G8排名2~9位，G9排名8~10位。综上，结合品种田间产量表现，AMMI模型分析品种与地点互作效应，DTOPSIS法分析品种综合性状优势得出，G1、G3是可参加黑龙江省区域试验的高产稳产型品种；G2为适应特殊生态环境的高产型品种；G6是可利用回交改良其产量的性状型品种；G8是抗倒性及抗病性突出的亲本材料型品种；G9是低产的淘汰型品种。
Abstract:
In order to explore the yield performance law and comprehensive character performance of nematode resistant soybean varieties in different ecological environment,and make an objective and reasonable comprehensive evaluation,this paper used AMMI model and DTOPSIS method to comprehensively analyze the data of five pilot trials of 10 nematode resistant soybean varieties from 2015 to 2016.AMMI model parameter analysis test data showed that the stability parameter Di value of G1 and G3 was small,which indicated that their genetic stability was good,while the stability parameter Di value of G4,G7 and G8 was large,and the stability was poor.DTOPSIS analysis of the comprehensive character data of each variety showed that the relative closeness Ci value of comprehensive character value of G1 and ideal variety was 0.612 3(2015) and 0.702 0(2016),G1 ranked first in the comprehensive character analysis of tested varieties,G2 ranked 3-8,G3 ranked 1-4,G8 ranked 2-9,and G9 ranked 8-10.In conclusion,combined with the field yield performance of varieties,AMMI model was used to analyze the interaction effect between varieties and locations,and DTOPSIS method was used to analyze the comprehensive character advantages of varieties.The results showed that G1 and G3 were high and stable yield varieties that could participate in the provincial regional test;G2 was high yield variety that could adapt to the special ecological environment;G6 was the variety that could use backcross to improve its yield character;G8 was the parent material variety with outstanding lodging resistance and disease resistance;and G9 was a low and stable yield eliminated variety.

参考文献/References:

［1］滕飞,王利民,刘佳.中美贸易摩擦背景下中国大豆进口潜力分析[J].中国农业信息,2018,30(5):102-109.

[2]谭春燕,李振动,朱星陶,等.AMMI模型在贵州大豆品种区域试验中的应用[J].贵州农业科学,2019,47(7):10-13.
[3]陈勇生,邓海华,刘福业,等.对应用几种统计模型评价甘蔗品种稳定性的初步比较[J].生物数学学报,2012,27(1):168-174.
[4]CHAMEKH Z,KARMOUS C,AYADI S,et al.Stability analysis of yield component traits in 25 durum wheat(Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes under contrasting irrigation water salinity[J].Agricultural Water Management,2015,152:1-6.
[5]黄英杰,张岩.谷子品种产量及主要产量构成因素稳定性的分析[J].作物杂志,2002(5):43-44.
[6]陈志雄,胡润芳,林国强.菜用大豆新品种区域试验的AMMI模型分析[J].大豆科技,2007(1):32-33.
[7]吴玥,李威,马德志,等.基于熵值赋权的DTOPSIS法对不同玉米品种综合评价研究[J].玉米科学,2019,27(4):32-41.
[8]贺清秀,周彦民.AMMI模型在重庆市玉米区域试验中的应用[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,42(9):109-115.
[9]王玉祥,张丽丽,曲志华,等.运用AMMI模型分析河北省油用亚麻区试品种的稳定性和适应性[J].中国麻业科学,2018,40(3):137-142.
[10]李元元,张征锋,孙辽,等.利用AMMI模型评价湖北省水稻区试品种的适应性[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(2):285-289.
[11]桃联安,经艳芬,董立华,等.云瑞15系列不同杂交途径甘蔗创新种质DTOPSIS综合评价[J].中国糖料,2020,42(1):13-21.
[12]郭瑞林,杨春玲,关立,等.小麦品种区域试验的同异分析方法研究[J].麦类作物学报,2001(3):60-63.
[13]昝凯,周青,张志民,等.灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现[J].大豆科学,2018,37(5):664-671.
[14]何霭如,李观康,陈胜勇,等.用AMMI模型分析甘薯品种产量性状的稳定性[J].安徽农业大学学报,2014,41(3):430-434.
[15]杨志平,何凤发,王季春,等.应用AMMI模型评价马铃薯品种的稳定性和适应性[J].中国马铃薯,2006(1):11-15.
[16]董孔军,何继红,杨天育.甘肃省糜子区试品种(系)稳定性的AMMI分析[J].作物杂志,2008(3):73-76.
[17]姜永平,刘水东,薛晨霞,等.DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在番茄品种综合评价中的应用比较[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(22):259-263.
[18]杨昆,吴才文,覃伟,等.DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在甘蔗新品种综合评价中的应用比较[J].西南农业学报,2015,28(4):1542-1547.
[19]李彦平,李淑君,吴娟霞,等.DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较[J].中国烟草学报,2012,18(4):35-40.

相似文献/References:

[1]吕静,韩莉梅,张所有.超氧化物歧化酶模拟物（SODM）对大豆保护酶系统的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):23.
　LYUJing,HANLi-mei,ZHANGSuo-you.EffectsofSuperoxideDismutaseMimics(SODM)onSoybeanProtectiveEnzymeSystem[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(06):23.
[2]吴俊彦,于晓光.黑河地区灾后补种大豆品种筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):13.
　WU Jun yan,YU Xiao guang.Soybean Varieties Screening Test for Reseeding in Heihe Region after Disaster[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(06):13.
[3]安咏梅,王家军,李进荣,等.大豆抗胞囊线虫的分子标记研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):15.
　AN Yong mei,WANG Jia jun,LI Jin rong,et al.Molecular Marker Assisted Selection on Soybean Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(06):15.
[4]刘兴龙,王克勤,朱立新,等.大豆蚜对大豆阶段性危害研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(06):57.
　LIU Xinglong,WANG Keqin,ZHU Lixin,et al.Study on Effect of Soybean Aphid on Soybean Growth at Different Stages[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(06):57.
[5]赵 寅.富裕县大豆生产现状及发展建议[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):150.
　ZHAO Yin.Production Situation and Suggestions of Soybean in Fuyu County[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(06):150.
[6]郑 旭,赵秀梅,王连霞,等.25%阿维〖DK1〗·福〖DK1〗·莠锈悬浮种衣剂病害防效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):54.
　ZHENG Xu,ZHAO Xiu-mei,WANG Lian-xia,et al.Field Efficacy Trial of 25% Abamectin·Thiram·Carboxin FSC Against Soybean Disease[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(06):54.
[7]袁明. 齐齐哈尔大豆综合试验站现代农业产业示范基地建设成效的探讨[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):143.
　YUANMing.DiscussiononConstructionEffectofQiqiharSoybeanComprehensiveExperimentalStationofModernAgriculturalIndustrializationDemonstrationBase[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(06):143.
[8]李亮,李泽宇,王丽娜,等.不同大豆品种耐盐性表现分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(02):17.
　LI Liang,LI Ze-yu,WANG Li-na,et al.Performance Analysis on Salt Tolerance for Different Soybean Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(06):17.
[9]郑新利,张丙双,寇贺.东北地区大豆生产主要问题及发展对策[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(02):146.
　ZHENG Xin-li,ZHANG Bing-shuang,KOU He.Main Problems and Developing Countermeasuresof Soybean in Northeast China[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(06):146.
[10]孙羽,冯延江,王麒,等.玉米茬原垄卡种大豆对其生长及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(03):26.
　SUN Yu,FENG Yan jiang,WANG Qi,et al.Effect of Original Ridge Tillage on the Growth and Yield of Soybean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(06):26.
[11]杜志强,田中艳,高国金,等.黑龙江省抗大豆孢囊线虫品种的应用及存在的问题[J].黑龙江农业科学,2006,(03):32.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2006.03.0032]
　DU Zhi-qiang,TIAN Zhong-yan,GAO Guo-jin,et al.Application and Problem of Using Resistant Variety to SCN in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2006,(06):32.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2006.03.0032]
[12]李肖白,刘冰,朱长明,等.富锦市大豆孢囊线虫危害现状及其防治措施[J].黑龙江农业科学,2008,(03):82.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.03.0082]
　LI Xiao-bai,LIU Bing,ZHU Chang-ming,et al.The Hazardous Situation of SCN and the ControlMethods to SCN in Fujin[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2008,(06):82.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.03.0082]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2022-02-20

基金项目：黑龙江省农业科学院”农业科技创新跨越工程”专项(HNK2019CX01)；国家大豆产业技术体系大庆综合试验站项目(CARS-004-CES07)；黑龙江省百千万工程科技重大专项(2019ZX16B01)；黑龙江省农业科学院青年基金项目（2017ZC17）。
第一作者：周长军（1977-）,男,硕士,副研究员,从事作物育种研究。E-mail：andazhouchangjun@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-28