[1]李亮,李泽宇,王丽娜,等.不同大豆品种耐盐性表现分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(02):17-20.
　LI Liang,LI Ze-yu,WANG Li-na,et al.Performance Analysis on Salt Tolerance for Different Soybean Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):17-20.
点击复制

不同大豆品种耐盐性表现分析

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2013年02 页码: 17-20 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-02-28
Title:
Performance Analysis on Salt Tolerance for Different Soybean Varieties
文章编号:
1002-2767（2013）02-0017-04
作者:
李亮; 李泽宇; 王丽娜; 芮海英; 金铃; 潘红丽; 金勋
黑龙江省农业科学院 大庆分院，黑龙江 大庆 163316
Author(s):
LI Liang; LI Ze-yu; WANG Li-na; RUI Hai-ying; JIN Ling; PAN Hong-li; JIN Xun
Daqing Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163316
关键词:
大豆; 耐盐性; 超氧化物歧化酶(SOD); 过氧化物酶(POD); 丙二醛(MDA)
Keywords:
soybean; salt tolerance; superoxicle dismutas(SOD); peroxidase(POD); malondialdehyde(MDA)
分类号:
S565.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为筛选和鉴定耐盐大豆品种,以大庆地区比较常见的主栽大豆品种抗线3号、抗线9号、1133和合丰50为材料,利用含有浓度为0.9%NaCl的1/2Hongland营养液对大豆幼苗进行盐处理试验。观察记录不同大豆品种幼苗的生长发育情况,同时在盐处理0、3、6、9、12、24和48h后分别取大豆幼苗的叶片和根系测量超氧化物歧化酶活性、过氧化物酶活性和丙二醛含量。结果表明:抗线3号在短时间内盐胁迫下的生长情况优于另3个品种,随着盐胁迫时间的延长不同大豆品种幼苗都出现明显的盐害现象,生长发育受到严重抑制;抗线3号的超氧化物歧化酶活性和过氧化物酶活性高于另3个大豆品种,而丙二醛含量低于另3个大豆品种。
Abstract:
For the purpose of selecting and identify salt resistance soybean varieties,taking the soybean varieties Kangxian No.3,Kangxian No.9,1133 and Hefeng50 as experiment materials,the roots of the seedlings were immersed in 1/2Hongland’s solutions containing 0.9%(W/V)NaCl,the different soybean varieties seedling growth and development were observed and recorded.The roots and leaves from plants of every cultivar under salt treatment were collected to measure SOD activity,peroxidase activity and malondialdehyde content after 0,3,6,9,12,24 and 48 hours.The results showed that growth and development of Kangxian No.3 under salt stress in a short time was better than the other varieties.With the stress time increasing,the seedlings were all presented salt injury,the growth were all restricted seriously.SOD and POD activity in Kangxian No.3 were higher than those of other soybean varieties,but the MDA content was lower than that of other soybean varieties.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王洪新，胡志昂，钟敏，等.盐渍条件下野大豆群体的遗传分化和生理适应同工酶和随机扩增多态DNA研究[J].植物学报，1997，39(1)：34-42.
[2]於丙军,罗庆云,曹爱忠,等.栽培大豆和野生大豆耐盐性及离子效应的比较[J].植物资源与环境学报，2001，10(1)：25-29.
[3]陈一舞，常汝镇，邵桂花，等.盐胁迫下大豆超氧物歧化酶的变化[J].作物学报，1994，20（3）：363-367. [4]Meng Xianggao，Wang Min，Jiang Nuowei，et al.Regulation of both the reactive oxygen species level and antioxidant enzyme activity in drought-stressed rice organs by benzimidazolate-based SOD1 mimics[J].J.Agric.Food Chem,2012，60(45)：11211-11221.
[5]Hu Wei，Yuan Qianqian，Wang Yan，et al.Overexpression of a wheat aquaporin gene,TaAQP8,enhances salt stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco[J].Plant Cell Physiol，2012，10：1093.
[6]刘鹏，杨玉爱.钼、硼对大豆叶片膜脂过氧化及体内保护系统的影响[J].植物学报，2000，42(5)：461-466. [7]於丙军，刘友良.盐胁迫对一年生盐生野大豆幼苗活性氧代谢的影响[J].西北植物学报，2003，23(1)：18-22.
[8]於丙军，罗庆云，刘友良.盐胁迫对盐生野大豆生长和离子分布的研究[J].作物学报，2001，27(6)：776-780.
[9]宋福南，杨传平，刘雪梅，等.盐胁迫对柽柳超氧化物歧化酶活性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报，2006，34(3)：54-56.
[10]刘宛，李培军，周启星，等.短期菲胁迫对大豆幼苗超氧化物歧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J].应用生态学报，2003,14(4):581-584.
[11]王启明，郑爱珍，吴诗光.干旱胁迫对花荚期大豆叶片保护酶活性和膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].安徽农业科学，2006，34(8)：1528-1530.
[12]Robert Sobkowiak,Katarzyna Rymer,Renata Rucińska，et al.Cadmium-induced changes in antioxidant enzymes in suspension culture of soybean cells[J].Acta Biochimica Polonico，2004，51(1)：219-222.
[13]Ismail Cakmak,Walter J Horst.Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation,superoxide dismutase,catalase,and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean(Glycine max)[J].Physiologia Plantarum，1991，83(3)：463-468.

相似文献/References:

[1]吕静,韩莉梅,张所有.超氧化物歧化酶模拟物（SODM）对大豆保护酶系统的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):23.
　LYUJing,HANLi-mei,ZHANGSuo-you.EffectsofSuperoxideDismutaseMimics(SODM)onSoybeanProtectiveEnzymeSystem[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):23.
[2]吴俊彦,于晓光.黑河地区灾后补种大豆品种筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):13.
　WU Jun yan,YU Xiao guang.Soybean Varieties Screening Test for Reseeding in Heihe Region after Disaster[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):13.
[3]安咏梅,王家军,李进荣,等.大豆抗胞囊线虫的分子标记研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):15.
　AN Yong mei,WANG Jia jun,LI Jin rong,et al.Molecular Marker Assisted Selection on Soybean Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):15.
[4]刘兴龙,王克勤,朱立新,等.大豆蚜对大豆阶段性危害研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(06):57.
　LIU Xinglong,WANG Keqin,ZHU Lixin,et al.Study on Effect of Soybean Aphid on Soybean Growth at Different Stages[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):57.
[5]赵 寅.富裕县大豆生产现状及发展建议[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):150.
　ZHAO Yin.Production Situation and Suggestions of Soybean in Fuyu County[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):150.
[6]郑 旭,赵秀梅,王连霞,等.25%阿维〖DK1〗·福〖DK1〗·莠锈悬浮种衣剂病害防效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):54.
　ZHENG Xu,ZHAO Xiu-mei,WANG Lian-xia,et al.Field Efficacy Trial of 25% Abamectin·Thiram·Carboxin FSC Against Soybean Disease[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):54.
[7]袁明. 齐齐哈尔大豆综合试验站现代农业产业示范基地建设成效的探讨[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):143.
　YUANMing.DiscussiononConstructionEffectofQiqiharSoybeanComprehensiveExperimentalStationofModernAgriculturalIndustrializationDemonstrationBase[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):143.
[8]郑新利,张丙双,寇贺.东北地区大豆生产主要问题及发展对策[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(02):146.
　ZHENG Xin-li,ZHANG Bing-shuang,KOU He.Main Problems and Developing Countermeasuresof Soybean in Northeast China[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(02):146.
[9]孙羽,冯延江,王麒,等.玉米茬原垄卡种大豆对其生长及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(03):26.
　SUN Yu,FENG Yan jiang,WANG Qi,et al.Effect of Original Ridge Tillage on the Growth and Yield of Soybean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):26.
[10]刘业丽,栾怀海,何琳,等.不同基因型大豆植株氮素积累变化动态研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(03):30.
　LIU Ye li,LUAN Huai hai,HE Lin,et al.Study on Dynamic Change of Nitrogen Accumulation in Different Soybean Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):30.

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2012-12-07
第一作者简介：李亮（1984-），男，黑龙江省哈尔滨市人，硕士，研究实习员，从事大豆逆境基因工程研究。E-mail:dongming116@163.com。
通讯作者：金勋（1962-），男，吉林省延吉市人，博士，副研究员，从事生物技术方面的研究。

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-02-28