ZHANG Guizhi,JIN Guanghui,DONG Quanzhong,et al.Effects of Different Seed Coating Agents on Agronomic Characters and Yield of Soybean Under Potato and Soybean Rotation Mode[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(04):36-40.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.04.0036]
薯豆轮作模式下不同种衣剂对大豆农艺性状及产量的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Different Seed Coating Agents on Agronomic Characters and Yield of Soybean Under Potato and Soybean Rotation Mode
- 文章编号:
- 8
- Keywords:
- soybean; seed coating agent; potato and soybean rotation mode; soybean continuous cropping; yield
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为指导薯豆轮作模式下的大豆生产，选用3种种衣剂，采用田间对比试验方法，以不包衣和连作处理为对照，研究不同种衣剂对轮作大豆农艺性状及产量的影响。结果表明，薯豆轮作方式下3种种衣剂应用效果优于豆豆连作，大豆种子包衣促进了大豆植株生长和发育，使株高、茎粗、节间数、单株有效结荚数、百粒重和产量增加，底荚高度降低，能促进早结荚，使植株重心降低可抗倒伏，同时也促进了根瘤的发生，且对大豆根腐病防治效果明显。其中使用复合微生物菌剂拌种处理大豆的根瘤数最多，防治大豆根腐病效果最好，促进了大豆植株的生长发育，植株粗壮，增加了有效结荚数和产量；精甲·咯菌腈包衣处理的收获株数最多，但对根腐病防治效果最差，发病率最高；阿维·多·福化学药剂处理大豆有效结荚数、百粒重和产量最高，增产效果最好。
- Abstract:
- In order to guide soybean production under potato and soybean rotation mode， three seed coating agents were selected to study the effects of different seed coating agents on agronomic characters and yield of soybean under different rotation mode. The results showed that the application effect of the three seed coating agents under potato and soybean rotation was better than that under soybean continuous cropping. Soybean seed dressing and coating promoted the growth and development of soybean plants， increased plant height， stem diameter， number of internodes， effective pods per plant， 100-seed weight and yield， reduced the height of bottom pods， promoted early podding， reduced the plant center of gravity， and resist lodging， at the same time promoted the occurrence of root nodules， and had obvious effects on the control of soybean root rot. Among them， the number of root nodules treated with compound microbial inoculants was the largest， and the effect of controlling soybean root rot was the best， which promoted the growth and development of soybean plants， promoted the effective podding and increased the yield; The number of harvested plants in the treatment of fine methyl-fluoxonitrile coating was the largest， but the control effect on root rot was the worst， and the incidence rate was the highest; The effective pod number， 100-seed weight and yield of Avi-do-Fu chemical treatment were the highest， and the yield increase effect was the best.
参考文献/References:
［1］华经产业研究院.中国大豆播种面积及增速情况及投资战略规划建议报告[R/OL].(2022-08-30)[2022-12-20].https://gov.sohu.com/a/580991255_121025301.[2]刘淼，邸树峰，郭新宇，等.高产高油大豆新品种中龙豆 1 号的选育及栽培技术[J].大豆科学，2022，41(2):249-252.[3]刘株秀.东北黑土区大豆连作土壤微生物群落变化的分子解析[D].长春：中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所)，2020.[4]王连霞，郑旭，李青超，等.不同种衣剂对大豆胞囊线虫病田间防效及连作大豆产量的影响[J/OL].分子植物育种:1-9（2022-08-31）[2022-10-02].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20220831.1151.004.html.[5]王楠，袁宝琪，刘文博，等.轮作和连作下大豆产量性状的QTL分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报，2022，53(1):83-88.[6]石长山.大豆的轮作和重迎茬保产技术初探[J].农业开发与装备，2018(8):185，190.[7]高宇，孙晨棋，罗英，等.中国大豆种子处理剂应用现状及研究进展[J].大豆科学，2022，41（5）：617-623.[8]訾勇，孙玉霞，王瑞霞.不同种衣剂对大豆生长发育和产量的影响[J].农业科技通讯，2016(8):81-82.[9]钟长春.复合生物种衣剂对大豆生长发育的影响及配比优化[D].成都：四川农业大学，2019.[10](顾鑫.几种药剂对大豆根腐病防治效果筛选试验[J].现代化农业，2010(4):51-53.[11]韩芳，包媛媛，刘项宇，等.不同轮作方式对马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J].生态环境学报，2021，30(7):1412-1419.[12]闫非凡.玉米-大豆轮作对大豆产量及土壤微生物群落的影响[D].延边：延边大学，2021.[13]张鹏.大豆玉米轮作及施肥对土壤有机碳组分及微生物多样性的影响[D].呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2019.[14]张树民.种衣剂对大豆根腐病及生长发育的影响[J].大豆科技，2017(5):34-36.[15]侯鑫格，颜士宇，郑永基，等.黑龙江大豆种衣剂品种的筛选与应用[J].黑龙江科学，2021，12（8）：42-43.[16]王宏燕，刘书宇，赵福华.生物种衣剂对大豆发芽和苗期生长、光合作用及酶活性的影响［J］.东北农业大学学报，2002，33（2)：111-115.[17]冯亚楠，李璨，冯乃杰，等.不同植物生长调节剂浸种对大豆幼苗子叶碳代谢的影响［J］.大豆科学，2009，28(6)：1016-1020.[18]龚国斌，金立.5种种衣剂对花生根腐病的防治效果试验[J].世界农药，2022，44（8）：39-43.[19]董智，王丽娟，刘可杰，等.种衣剂和微肥对玉米茎腐病发生危害的影响[J].玉米科学，2022，30(3):151-155.
相似文献/References:
[1]吕静,韩莉梅,张所有.超氧化物歧化酶模拟物（SODM）对大豆保护酶系统的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):23.
LYUJing,HANLi-mei,ZHANGSuo-you.EffectsofSuperoxideDismutaseMimics(SODM)onSoybeanProtectiveEnzymeSystem[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(04):23.
[2]吴俊彦,于晓光.黑河地区灾后补种大豆品种筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):13.
WU Jun yan,YU Xiao guang.Soybean Varieties Screening Test for Reseeding in Heihe Region after Disaster[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(04):13.
[3]安咏梅,王家军,李进荣,等.大豆抗胞囊线虫的分子标记研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):15.
AN Yong mei,WANG Jia jun,LI Jin rong,et al.Molecular Marker Assisted Selection on Soybean Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(04):15.
[4]刘兴龙,王克勤,朱立新,等.大豆蚜对大豆阶段性危害研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(06):57.
LIU Xinglong,WANG Keqin,ZHU Lixin,et al.Study on Effect of Soybean Aphid on Soybean Growth at Different Stages[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(04):57.
[5]赵 寅.富裕县大豆生产现状及发展建议[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):150.
ZHAO Yin.Production Situation and Suggestions of Soybean in Fuyu County[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(04):150.
[6]郑 旭,赵秀梅,王连霞,等.25%阿维〖DK1〗·福〖DK1〗·莠锈悬浮种衣剂病害防效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):54.
ZHENG Xu,ZHAO Xiu-mei,WANG Lian-xia,et al.Field Efficacy Trial of 25% Abamectin·Thiram·Carboxin FSC Against Soybean Disease[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(04):54.
[7]袁明. 齐齐哈尔大豆综合试验站现代农业产业示范基地建设成效的探讨[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):143.
YUANMing.DiscussiononConstructionEffectofQiqiharSoybeanComprehensiveExperimentalStationofModernAgriculturalIndustrializationDemonstrationBase[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(04):143.
[8]李亮,李泽宇,王丽娜,等.不同大豆品种耐盐性表现分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(02):17.
LI Liang,LI Ze-yu,WANG Li-na,et al.Performance Analysis on Salt Tolerance for Different Soybean Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(04):17.
[9]郑新利,张丙双,寇贺.东北地区大豆生产主要问题及发展对策[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(02):146.
ZHENG Xin-li,ZHANG Bing-shuang,KOU He.Main Problems and Developing Countermeasuresof Soybean in Northeast China[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(04):146.
[10]孙羽,冯延江,王麒,等.玉米茬原垄卡种大豆对其生长及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(03):26.
SUN Yu,FENG Yan jiang,WANG Qi,et al.Effect of Original Ridge Tillage on the Growth and Yield of Soybean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(04):26.
[11]张荣芳,郑铁军,李宝英,等.35%多·福·克大豆超微粉种衣剂应用效果研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(12):50.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.12.0050]
ZHANG Rong-fang,ZHENG Tie-jun,LI Bao-ying,et al.Study on Application Effect of Seed Coating of Soybean Superfine Powder of 35% Carbendazim Thiram Carbofuran[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(04):50.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.12.0050]
[12]刘秀林,杨 扬,苗丽丽,等.大豆种衣剂田间筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2017,(01):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.01.0048]
LIU Xiu-lin,YANG Yang,MIAO Li-li,et al.Field Selecting of Seed-coating Agent for Soybean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2017,(04):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.01.0048]
[13]王连霞,赵秀梅,郑 旭,等.抗低温冷害大豆种衣剂比较试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(01):39.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.01.0039]
WANG Lian-xia,ZHAO Xiu-mei,ZHENG Xu,et al.Comparative Experiment of Soybean Seed Coating Agents Resistant to Low Temperature Chilling Injury[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(04):39.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.01.0039]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2022-11-28