[1]郭数进,李贵全.晋旱125 ×(昔野×501)杂交后代保护酶与抗旱性关系的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2008,(02):23-26.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.02.0023]
　GUO Shu-jin,LI Gui-quan.Research on Relationship between Protecting Enzyme and DroughtResistance of Hybrid Descendents of Jinhan125 ×(Xiye ×501)[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2008,(02):23-26.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.02.0023]
点击复制

晋旱125 ×(昔野×501)杂交后代保护酶与抗旱性关系的研究

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2008年02 页码: 23-26 栏目: 出版日期: 2008-05-10
Title:
Research on Relationship between Protecting Enzyme and DroughtResistance of Hybrid Descendents of Jinhan125 ×(Xiye ×501)
文章编号:
1002-2767(2008)02-0023-04
作者:
郭数进;  李贵全
山西农业大学农学院, 太谷030801
Author(s):
GUO Shu-jin;  LI Gui-quan
Agro nomy Co llege of Shanxi Ag ricultural University , Taigu 030801
关键词:
大豆; 保护酶系; 抗旱性
Keywords:
so ybean; pro tec ting enzyme ; drought-resistance
分类号:
S565 .1
DOI:
10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.02.0023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
选用晋旱125 ×(昔野×501)杂交组合的亲本及后代所产生的有代表性的四个特殊类型73-1(尖叶白花)、73-2(圆叶紫花)、73-3(圆叶白花)、73-4(尖叶紫花)为试验材料, 分别在正常供水和干旱胁迫的条件下, 测定苗期和花荚期的POD、SOD、CAT 等与抗旱性相关的保护酶指标, 并对株高、株荚数、百粒重等农艺性状进行综合分析, 还对亲本和子代的抗旱性差异情况用抗旱性隶属函数值(D 值)进行了综合的测评, 结果表明:干旱胁迫下,不同品系的保护酶活性均有所变化, 且在不同时期, 各种酶的变化程度不同;在大豆对水分最为敏感的花荚期对SOD、POD、CAT 的活性进行测定和分析, 采用抗旱隶属函数值的方法综合测评, 认为这一群体中抗旱性从强到弱的次序为:晋旱125 、73-2(圆叶紫花)、昔野×501 、73-1(尖叶白花)、73-3(圆叶白花)、73-4(尖叶紫花)。
Abstract:
In this paper , fo ur special repre sentativ e ty pes from a cro ss betw een Jinhan125(Xiey e 501)were selectedas test ma te rials , they we re 73-1(sha rp leaf and white flower), 73-2(ro und leaf and pur ple flow er), 73-3(ro undleaf and w hite flowe r), 73-4(sha rp leaf and purple flowe r).In the study , in the conditio n o f normal w ater supplyand droug ht st ress, index es o f pro tecting enzyme relevant to dr ought-r esistance in the periods of y oung plant andflower-po dding w ere determined.The inde xes w ere activ ities of POD, SOD, CA T.Additionally , ag ricultural cha racte rs such as heig ht o f plant, total pods, hundr ed-seed weight and so o n wer e comprehensively analyzed.Also ,drought-resistant differ ence betw ee n pa rents and descendants w as comprehensively ev aluated by subor dinate functionva lue , the r esults showed :I n the conditio n of dr ought stress, activity of protecting enzymes of various v arie tieschanged and the cha nging ex tents o f enzyme s w ere distinct in different perio ds.So , activity of protecting enzymecould be utilized as one of the indexe s compressively evaluating droug ht-resistance of soy beans .During the breedingperio d, the flower-po dding pe rio d was the mo st se nsitive to water content , in this perio d, activities of POD,SOD and CAT w ere determined and analy zed .Simultaneously , the method of droug ht-resistant subo rdina te functionvalue w as employ ed to assess comprehensively .The o rder of dr ought-re sistance of the g r oup was consideredas follow ing :Jinhan125, 73-2(ro und leaf and purple flowe r), (Xiye 501), 73-1(sharp leaf and white flow er), 73-3(round leaf and white flow er), 73-4(sha rp leaf and purple flower).

参考文献/References:

[ 1] 李贵全, 杜维俊, 孔照胜, 等.不同大豆品种抗旱生理生态的研究[ J] .山西农业大学学报, 2001 , 20(3):197-200 .

[ 2] 宋淑英, 尹田夫.不同品种大豆的产量及质膜透性对水分胁迫的反应[ J] .大豆科学, 1985 , 4(4):279-284 .
[ 3] 山西农业大学植物生理教研室编.植物生理学实验指导[ M] .太谷:山西农业大学, 1999 .
[ 4] 孙祖东, 陈怀珠, 杨守臻.大豆抗旱性研究进展[ J] .大豆科学,2001 , 20(3):221-225 .
[ 5] 王瑞云, 王玉国, 杨晓霞.大豆抗旱的生理生态基础[ J] .山西农业大学学报, 2001 , 21(1):305-307 .
[ 6] Ack ers on R C .C om parat ive phy siology and wat er relati ons oftw o co rn hybrids du ring w ater st ress[ J] .Crop S cien ce, 1983 ,23 :278 .
[ 7] Bray E A .Molecular res ponse t o w ater defi cit[ J] .Plant Physiology, 1993 , 103 :1035-1040 .

相似文献/References:

[1]李亮,李泽宇,王丽娜,等.不同大豆品种耐盐性表现分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(02):17.
　LI Liang,LI Ze-yu,WANG Li-na,et al.Performance Analysis on Salt Tolerance for Different Soybean Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):17.
[2]吕静,韩莉梅,张所有.超氧化物歧化酶模拟物（SODM）对大豆保护酶系统的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):23.
　LYUJing,HANLi-mei,ZHANGSuo-you.EffectsofSuperoxideDismutaseMimics(SODM)onSoybeanProtectiveEnzymeSystem[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):23.
[3]李鹤鹏,付亚书,姜士波,等.几种常用除草剂在大豆田的防效评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):43.
　LIHe-peng,FUYa-shu,JIANGShi-bo,et al.EvaluationonControlEffectofSeveralCommonHerbicidesinSoybeanField[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):43.
[4]李艳杰.接种大豆根瘤菌对大豆生长及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):50.
　LIYan-jie.EffectsofRhizobiaInoculationonSoybeanGrowthandYield[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):50.
[5]丁俊杰.大豆细菌斑点病抗性鉴定的研究概况[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):132.
　DINGJun-jie.TheResearchStatusofTheResistanceIdentificationtoPseudomonassyringaepv.glycinea[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):132.
[6]袁明. 齐齐哈尔大豆综合试验站现代农业产业示范基地建设成效的探讨[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(01):143.
　YUANMing.DiscussiononConstructionEffectofQiqiharSoybeanComprehensiveExperimentalStationofModernAgriculturalIndustrializationDemonstrationBase[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(02):143.
[7]吴俊彦,于晓光.黑河地区灾后补种大豆品种筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):13.
　WU Jun yan,YU Xiao guang.Soybean Varieties Screening Test for Reseeding in Heihe Region after Disaster[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):13.
[8]安咏梅,王家军,李进荣,等.大豆抗胞囊线虫的分子标记研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):15.
　AN Yong mei,WANG Jia jun,LI Jin rong,et al.Molecular Marker Assisted Selection on Soybean Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):15.
[9]刘兴龙,王克勤,朱立新,等.大豆蚜对大豆阶段性危害研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(06):57.
　LIU Xinglong,WANG Keqin,ZHU Lixin,et al.Study on Effect of Soybean Aphid on Soybean Growth at Different Stages[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):57.
[10]赵 寅.富裕县大豆生产现状及发展建议[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):150.
　ZHAO Yin.Production Situation and Suggestions of Soybean in Fuyu County[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(02):150.

备注/Memo

基金项目:山西农业大学科技创新基金项目(育种基金)(2006057)

第一作者简介:郭数进(1979-), 男, 山西太谷人, 硕士, 助教, 主要从事大豆遗传育种研究。E-mai l:wi lliamlet ter @163 .com 。

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-12