LI He-peng,YANG Guang-yi.Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicides Screening in Sorghum[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(12):65-67.
高粱除草药剂的筛选
- Title:
- Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicides Screening in Sorghum
- 文章编号:
- 1002-2767（2010）12-0065-03
- Keywords:
- sorghum; herbicides screening; preemergence; postemergence
- 分类号:
- S514
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 针对高粱苗前苗后除草剂难以选择，缺少有效化学除草手段的现状，2010年在黑龙江省农业科学院绥化分院的管家科技园、郎家寨两处的试验地分别进行了高粱播后苗前封闭及苗后茎叶处理化学除草剂的筛选。结果表明:苗前使用异丙甲草胺+二甲戊灵封闭，对杂草的防效最高可达89.50%，对高粱出苗及生长无明显副作用；苗前使用异丙甲草胺+莠去津封闭，苗后使用莠去津对高粱无副作用，对杂草具有较好的抑制作用；苗后使用二氯喹啉酸或二甲?灭草松茎叶处理，对杂草的防效分别达86.40%和81.37%，对高粱生长无明显副作用。
- Abstract:
- It was difficult to select effective herbicides in preemergence and postemergence periods in sorghum.Because of the situation of lacking of effective method to control the weeds，the herbicides screening test was carried out in Guanjia techno park and Langjiazhai of Suihua Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences in 2010 to give farmers some suggestions on herbicides selection.The results showed that the control efficiency on weeds was up to 89.50% through the closed soil treatment with metolachlor and pendimethalin in preemergence period，and there was no obvious adverse effect on the emergence and growth of sorghum.Metolachlor and atrazine used in preemergence period and atrazine used in postemergence period had high inhibition on weeds.The control efficiency of quinclorac and 7.5% MCPA and 30% bentazone used in postemergence period in stem treatment on weeds was up to 86.40% and 81.37%，respectively，and there was no obvious adverse effect on sorghum growth.
参考文献/References:
[1]张志高，杨文祥，尹小根.含有二氯喹啉酸的除草组合物和制备方法及其在麦田上的应用技术:中国，CN00132577.9[P].2001-05-30. [2]曹方元，仇广灿，胡键.氰氟草酯防除麦套稻田杂草田间试验[J].大麦与谷类科学，2008(4):40-41. [3]黑龙江农垦信息网.2009年12月9日黑龙江农资市场价格行情[EB/OL].2009-12-09.http://www.hljny.com/new_view.asp?id=4389. [4]谢文明，刘兴泉，范志先.莠去津在土壤中的残留动态和淋溶动态[J].农药学学报，2003(1):82-87.
相似文献/References:
[1]马长山,王胜华,张浩然,等.88%异丙甲草胺乳油防除高粱田杂草田间药效评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(07):70.
MA Chang-shan,WANG Sheng-hua,ZHANG Hao ran,et al.Efficacy Evaluation of 88% Metolachlor EC on Sorghum Weed[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(12):70.
[2]沈海军.黑龙江省高粱出苗不全的原因与对策[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(02):152.
SHEN Hai-jun.Reasons and Countermeasures of Sorghum Incomplete Emergence in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(12):152.
[3]邢慧清,黄赛楠,张云鹤,等.分子标记在高粱抗病虫基因定位上的研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(09):139.
XING Hui-qing,HUANG Sai-nan,ZHANG Yun-he,et al.Research Advances of Mapping the Sorghum’s Resistance Genes to Disease and Inset by Molecular Markers[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(12):139.
[4]杨 学,关凤芝,李柱刚,等.亚麻枯萎病病原菌鉴定及药剂筛选[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(02):36.
YANG Xue,GUAN Feng-zhi,LI Zhu-gang,et al.Identification of Flax Blight Pathogeny and Medicament Selection[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(12):36.
[5]焦少杰,王黎明,姜艳喜,等.黑龙江省高粱生产发展演变过程分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(05):138.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.05.0138]
JIAO Shao-jie,WANG Li-ming,JIANG Yan-xi,et al.Analysis on Evolution Process of Sorghum Production Development in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(12):138.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.05.0138]
[6]季志强,张 勤,赵共鹏,等.承德地区高粱发展现状与应对措施分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(06):133.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.06.0133]
JI Zhi-qiang,ZHANG Qin,ZHAO Gong-peng,et al.Current Status and Countermeasures of the Sorghum Production in Chengde Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(12):133.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.06.0133]
[7]杨广东,胡尊艳,刘玲玲,等.高寒地区不同氮肥水平对高粱产量和品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(06):43.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.06.0043]
YANG Guang-dong,HU Zun-yan,LIU Ling-ling,et al.Effect of Different Nitrogen on Yield and Quality of Sorghum in Frigid Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(12):43.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.06.0043]
[8]王 聪,杨克军,魏金鹏,等.黑龙江西部半干旱地区高粱品种比较试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(01):12.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.01.0012]
WANG Cong,YANG Ke-jun,WEI Jin-peng,et al.Comparison Experiment of Different Sorghum Varieties in Semi-arid Region of Western Area of Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(12):12.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.01.0012]
[9]李春阳,时亚男,张馨月,等.高粱抗丝黑穗病主要抗性生理指标比较[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(10):85.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.10.0085]
LI Chun-yang,SHI Ya-nan,ZHANG Xin-yue,et al.Comparison of Resistance Physiology Indicators of Sorghum Head Smut[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(12):85.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.10.0085]
[10]王黎明,阴秀卿. 高粱导入外源DNA后代的过氧化的酶及酯酶同工酶酶谱分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,1994,(03):17.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1994.03.0017]
Wang Liming,Yin Xiuqing.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,1994,(12):17.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1994.03.0017]
备注/Memo
第一作者简介： 李鹤鹏（1982-），男，山西省天镇县人，学士，研究实习员，从事农药研究。E-mail:lihepeng2005@yahoo.com.cn。