WANG Yu,CONG Lin,LIU Xiao-hui,et al.Effect of Serpentine Tube Poisonous Bait in Rice Field[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(07):59-60.
蛇形毒饵站的稻田防治效果试验
- Title:
- Effect of Serpentine Tube Poisonous Bait in Rice Field
- 文章编号:
- 1002-2767（2010）07-0059-02
- 分类号:
- S443
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了确定自主研发的蛇形管毒饵站的使用效果，于2007年7月在哈尔滨市民主乡高玉环屯水稻田进行了田间防治试验。结果表明：在处理样地中的毒饵站平均毒饵消耗量的下降趋势符合y=5.169 3e-0.0685x，R2 =0.984 5；在对照中平均饵料消耗量增长趋势符合y=1.820 7e0.027x，R2 =0.966 7。说明在处理样地中的毒饵消耗随着害鼠数量的减少而逐渐减少，对照样地中害鼠对毒饵站中的饵料选择性增加，使饵料的消耗量逐渐增加。夹夜结果为处理平均捕获率为2％，对照平均捕获率为11.33％，防治率为82.35％，防治效果明显。
- Abstract:
- In order to test the serpentine tube poisonous bait station which autonomous innovative by ourselves,it was tested it in rice field experiment in Harbin Minzhu townships Gao Yuhuan village in July 2007.The results showed that consumption averaged poison bait with poison accord with the decreasing function：y=5.169 3e-0.0685x，R2 =0.984 5，and consumption averaged poison bait with no poison plot accord with the increase function y =1.820 7e0.027x，R2 =0.966 7.It is shown that poison bait consumption reduced because of the number of rodents decreased in the treatment plot，and poison bait consumption increased because of rodents selectivity increasing in the control plot.The results of the night traps showed that the average capture rate was 2% in the treatment plot，the average capture rate was 11.33% in the control plot，the effect of prevention and cure was 82.35%.
参考文献/References:
[1] 潘世昌，李梅，邓启国，等 . 毒饵站灭鼠技术研究[J] 农技服务， 2007（6）： 56 - 57 . [2]顾士光，朱建文，赵锋，等.农田灭鼠“毒饵站”技术示范初探[J]上海农业科技，2009（2）：118-119. [3]杨再学，郑元利.利用“毒饵站”灭鼠方法[J]农技服务，2005（6）：36. [4]吴进权.推广毒饵站灭鼠效果好[J]福建农业，2005（10）：18. [5]吴光华.灭鼠[M]//消灭杀手册编写组.消毒杀虫灭鼠手册,北京：人民卫生出版社，1980:456-569. [6]董天义.抗凝血灭鼠剂应用研究[M]北京：中国科学技术出版社，2001：79-84.
相似文献/References:
[1]石凤梅.25%戊唑醇WG对水稻稻瘟病的防治效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(06):47.
SHI Fengmei.Control Effect of 25％ Tebuconazole WG on Rice Blast[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(07):47.
[2]王连霞.不同种类赤眼蜂防治玉米螟效果比较[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(02):54.
WANG Lian-xia.Effect Comparison on Controlling Maize Borer of Different Species of Trichogramma[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(07):54.
[3]张荣华,刘双利,许庆芬,等.八种药剂对马铃薯晚疫病的防效及经济效益分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(03):60.
ZHANG Rong hua,LIU Shuang li,XU Qing fen,et al.Control Effect and Economic Benefits Analysis of Eight Pesticides on Potato Late Blight[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(07):60.
[4]张世斌.2.5%咪鲜.吡虫啉悬浮种衣剂防治水稻苗期病害效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(04):41.
ZHANG Shi-bin.Effect of 2.5% Prochloraz.Imidacloprid FS on Controlling the Rice Seedling Diseases[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(07):41.
[5]马立功.10.2%福美双·戊唑醇悬浮种衣剂防治玉米丝黑穗病药效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(02):41.
MA Li-gong.Study on the Control Effects of Thiram·Tebuconazole 10.2% Flowable Concentrate for Seed CoatingFSCon Head Smut Disease in Maize[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(07):41.
[6]曲金玲.稻鸭共栖防除杂草及害虫的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(06):67.
QU Jin-ling.Research on Rice-duck Commensalisms to Control Weed and Pests[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(07):67.
[7]徐森富,王会福.苯醚甲环唑·丙环唑30%乳油对水稻纹枯病的防治效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(12):75.
XU Sen-fu,WANG Hui-fu.Effect of Difenoconazole·Propiconazole 30% ECagainst Rice Sheath Blight[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(07):75.
[8]赵俊侠.70%甲基硫菌灵?硫磺WP防治黄瓜白粉病田间药效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(12):47.
ZHAO Jun-xia.Field Efficacy Test of 70% Thiophanate-methyl on Prevention of Cucumber Powdery Mildew[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(07):47.
[9]陈磊,赵秀梅,刘洋,等.性诱剂诱捕器对玉米螟的田间防治效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(10):57.
CHEN Lei,ZHAO Xiu-mei,LIU Yang,et al.Field Control Effects of Sex Pheromone Traps on Maize Borer[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(07):57.
[10]付久才,韩玉军.不同杀菌剂对水稻稻瘟病的防治效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(01):54.
FU Jiu-cai,HAN Yu-jun.Effects of Different Fungicides on Rice Blast[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(07):54.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：王宇（1981-），男，黑龙江省哈尔滨市人，硕士，研究实习员，从事植物保护研究。E-mail：wjkyo156@sohu.com。