WTHZWANG Heya,LUO Jingjing,CUI Yu,et al.Adaptability of Sugar Beet Varieties in Ta’e Basin Based on Grey Correlation Degree and Principal Component Analysis[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2024,(03):12-16.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.03.0012]
基于灰色关联度和主成分分析的塔额盆地甜菜品种的适应性分析
- Title:
- Adaptability of Sugar Beet Varieties in Ta’e Basin Based on Grey Correlation Degree and Principal Component Analysis
- 文章编号:
- 3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为筛选适宜新疆塔额盆地种植的高产优质抗根腐病的甜菜品种，2022年在新疆兵团第九师农业科学研究所团结农场试验基地，以10个引种及1个对照品种（BETA6990）为试验材料，通过灰色关联度分析、主成分分析和相关分析法对甜菜的根腐病和根产量、含糖率、产糖量4个指标进行综合评价。结果表明，甜菜的根产量与产糖量呈现极显著正相关（0.990 3**），但与根腐病呈现极显著负相关（-0.932 5**），主成分分析表明，前两个主成分累积贡献率97.921 3%，能够完整地反映甜菜综合评价的主要信息。第一主成分载荷值较高的为产量和含糖量，第二主成分载荷值较高的为含糖率，方程表达式为F1=-0.349 8根腐病发病率+0.375 0根产量-0.178 4含糖率+0.336 0产糖量，F2=0.060 5根腐病发病率-0.128 2根产量+1.035 0含糖率+0.131 3产糖量。塔额盆地甜菜参试品种综合排名表明，最适宜塔额盆地种植的甜菜品种为KWS5599，其次为BETA468，这两个品种都具有产量高、根腐病发病率低的优点。
- Abstract:
- In order to screen high-yield and high-quality root rot resistant sugar beet varieties suitable for planting in Ta’e Basin, Xinjiang. In 2022, 10 introduced seeds and one control variety (BETA6990) were used as test materials in the Unity Farm Experimental Base of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Ninth Division of the Xinjiang Corps to comprehensively evaluate the root rot and root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugar beet by gray correlation analysis, principal component analysis and correlation analysis. The results shouwed that the root yield and sugar yield of sugar beet were positively correlated (0.990 3**), but negatively correlated with root rot (-0.932 5**), and the principal component analysis showed that the cumulative contribution rate of the first two principal components was 97.921 3%, which could fully reflect the main information of the comprehensive evaluation of sugar beet. The first principal component load value was higher yield and sugar content, the second principal component load value was higher for sugar content, the equation expression was: F1=-0.349 8 root rot + 0.375 0 root yield -0.178 4 sugar content + 0.336 0 sugar yield, F2=0.060 5 root rot -0.128 2 root yield + 1.035 0 sugar content + 0.131 3 sugar yield.The experimental results showed that the most suitable varieties for planting in the Taege Basin was KWS5599, followed by BETA468, and both varieties have the advantages of high yield and low disease rate.
参考文献/References:
［1］BUTORINA A K, KORNIENKO A V. Molecular genetic investigation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)[J]. Genetika, 2011, 47(10): 1285-1296. [2]DOHM J C, MINOCHE A E, HOLTGRWE D, et al. The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)[J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7484): 546-549. [3]崔平. 甜菜种质资源遗传多样性研究与利用[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(4): 688-691. [4]鄂圆圆,白晨,张惠忠,等.华北区甜菜种质资源的收集、鉴定、评价[J].内蒙古农业科技,2015,43(1):17-18. [5]郭亚宁, 兴旺, 周建朝, 等. 甜菜核心种质构建研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(24): 41-46. [6]董玉良. 基于灰色关联度对山东小麦新品种(系)综合表现评价分析[J]. 现代农业研究, 2020, 26(9): 77-78. [7]宋志美, 刘乃雁, 王元英, 等. 灰色关联度法在烤烟品种重要性状综合评价中的运用[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(2): 17-19, 23. [8]杨涛, 周琴, 姜东, 等. 灰色关联分析法在不同小麦品种饼干品质评价中的应用[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(4): 464-472. [9]马炳美. 灰色关联度分析在桂花品种评价中的应用[J]. 福建林业科技, 2020, 47(2): 106-108, 115. )[10](景芳, 任生兰, 边芳, 等. 16个燕麦品种在甘肃陇中地区的适应性评价与筛选[J]. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(1): 68-76. [11]任晓琴, 文昊, 薛晓琦, 等. 基于主成分分析的10个葡萄品种果实营养元素比较[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2022, 29(4): 13-16. [12]魏常敏, 周文伟, 许卫猛, 等. 基于主成分和灰色关联度分析的鲜食糯玉米组合综合评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(7): 9-13. [13]范继征, 石达金, 吕巨智, 等. 基于关联度、主成分和聚类分析的西南区玉米新组合评价[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(1): 102-110. [14]张凡, 薛鑫, 刘国涛, 等. 基于灰色关联度分析法和聚类分析法筛选小麦高产优质新品种(系)的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27): 6-13. [15]杨芳, 张成, 乔岩. 陇东旱地冬小麦新品系产量与农艺性状的灰色关联度及主成分分析[J]. 陇东学院学报, 2015, 26(1): 4-9. [16]钱建南, 丁颖, 李玉杨, 等. 14个水稻品种产量与农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2022, 39(5): 37-41. [17]李慧琳, 向依, 于二汝, 等. 贵州食葵种质资源农艺性状主成分和聚类分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(12): 98-105. [18]鲁兆新, 罗成飞, 史淑芝, 等. 对甜菜产量、含糖与农艺性状的灰色关联度分析(二)[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 2011(4): 3-5. [19]林明,王荣华,曹禹,等.基于光合性状和农艺性状评价不同甜菜品种的生态稳定性[J].中国农业大学学报,2023,28(2):43-58.[20]陈柳宏,赵春雷,王希,等.我国东北地区205份主要甜菜种质资源的鉴定与评价分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2022,23(1): 92-105. [21]陈彦云,曹君迈.甜菜抗(耐)丛根病杂交组合品种的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国甜菜糖业,2001(4): 38-40. [22]苏欣欣,肖洋,胡晓航,等.基于灰色关联度分析和主成分分析法评估糖用甜菜品种的适应性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(30): 39-46. [23]张自强, 王良, 白晨, 等. 104份甜菜种质资源主要农艺性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(3): 29-36.
相似文献/References:
[1]吴建忠,赵 茜,关凤芝.11个亚麻品种的产量特征分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(10):18.
WU Jian-zhong,ZHAO Qian,GUAN Feng-zhi.Yield Characteristics Analysis of Eleven Flax Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(03):18.
[2]刘 峰.红小豆品种（系）的灰色关联度分析及综合评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2011,(05):7.
LIU Feng.Grey Correlation DegreeAnalysis and ComprehensiveEvaluation of Adzuki Bean Cultivars (Lines)[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2011,(03):7.
[3]李素萍,安玉麟,郭树春,等.食葵主要农艺性状的遗传变异及相关性和主成分分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(09):7.
LI Su-ping,AN Yu-lin,GUO Shu-chun,et al.Analysis on Hereditary Variation，Correlation and Principal Components of Main Agronomic Characters in Confectionery Sunflower[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):7.
[4]闫 锋.黑龙江省晚熟谷子种质资源的灰色关联度分析及综合评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(07):30.
YAN Feng.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Serotinous Millet Germplasm Resources in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):30.
[5]任光超,杨德利,管红波.基于主成分分析法的我国海洋资源承载力变化趋势研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2011,(08):47.
REN Guang-chao,YANG De-li,GUAN Hong-bo.Research on Variation Tendency of Marine Resource Carrying Capacity in China Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2011,(03):47.
[6]王囡囡.掐尖大豆主要性状的灰色关联度分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(12):17.
WANG Nan-nan.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis on Major Traits of Topping Soybean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):17.
[7]闫 锋,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.糜子主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(05):37.
YAN Feng,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis of Main Agronomic Character of Broomcorn Millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):37.
[8]刘柏静,叶长青.广州市绿地景观空间特征评价与规划对策[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(10):95.
LIU Bai-jing,YE Chang-qing.Comprehensive Assessment of Spatial Characteristics of Urban Greenbelt Landscapes and Planning Strategies in Guangzhou City[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(03):95.
[9]仁 钰,韩学平.黑龙江省农业现代化发展进程评价研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(01):121.
REN Yu,HAN Xue-ping.Evaluation on the Agricultural Modernization Process in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(03):121.
[10]吕乐福,杨彦军,窦兴霞,等.复混肥中氮磷钾和氯离子实验室间比对结果分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(10):58.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.10.0058]
LYU Le-fu,YANG Yan-jun,DOU Xing-xia,et al.Analysis of Inner-laboratory Comparison Results on Nitrogen,Phosphorus,Potassium and Chloride Ion in Compound Fertilizer[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(03):58.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.10.0058]
[11]周长军.黑龙江省联合体试验玉米新品种综合性状评价及与环境互作的分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021,(11):1.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.11.0001]
ZHOU Chang-jun.Comprehensive Traits Evaluation and Analysis of Interaction with Environment of the New Maize Varieties Consortium Test in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(03):1.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.11.0001]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2024-01-17