QIN Yang,DONG Chang,LU Huiling,et al.Effects of Humic Acid Compound Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients and Grape Qualities in Greenhouse of Cold Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(08):78-82.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.08.0078]
施用腐殖酸复合肥对高寒地区大棚葡萄土壤养分及果实品质的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Humic Acid Compound Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients and Grape Qualities in Greenhouse of Cold Area
- 文章编号:
- 13
- Keywords:
- cold regions; humic acid fertilizer; soil nutrients; berry qualities
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了探索施用腐殖酸复合肥在高寒地区对葡萄品种‘夏黑’和‘无核白鸡心’果实品质的影响以及施肥后土壤理化指标的变化，在大棚栽培条件下，从葡萄开花前采用栽植沟内冲施3 000倍液腐殖酸肥的方法，每30 d 1次，共4次，调查其对葡萄植株根系周边土壤主要指标及果实品质的影响。结果表明，‘夏黑’葡萄施用腐殖酸肥后较施肥前，其根系周边土壤的水解性氮含量减少5.7%，对照清水处理后较处理前减少13.5%，施肥处理较对照提升了7.8百分点；施用腐殖酸肥后较施肥前有效磷含量增加9.1%，对照清水处理后较处理前增加4.8%，施肥处理较对照提升了4.3百分点；施用腐殖酸肥后较施肥前速效钾含量增加3.1%，对照清水处理后较处理前增加2.6%，施肥处理较对照提升了0.5百分点。施用腐殖酸肥后较施肥前水溶性盐含量减少82.4%，对照清水处理后较处理前减少50.0%，施肥处理较对照相差32.4百分点，降盐效果明显；土壤pH也略有下降，施用腐殖酸肥后较施肥前从7.7降到7.4。施用腐殖酸复合肥后，‘夏黑’葡萄的粒重、穗重、可溶性固形物含量分别比对照增加13.09%、13.29%和13.11%，对提升葡萄果实品质有比较明显的积极作用。‘无核白鸡心’葡萄施用腐殖酸复合肥后较施肥前，根系周边土壤的有机质含量比对照提升了1.9个百分点，‘无核白鸡心’葡萄的粒重、穗重、可溶性固形物含量分别比对照增加15.20%、10.16%、1.70%，对提升果实品质也有明显的积极作用。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the effect of applying humic acid compound fertilizer on the fruit quality of grape varieties ’Summer Black’ and ’Seedless White Chicken Heart’ in high and cold regions, as well as the changes in soil physicochemical indicators after fertilization, under greenhouse cultivation conditions, 3 000 times of liquid humic acid fertilizer was applied in the planting ditch before grape flowering, once every 30 days, a total of 4 times, to investigate its impact on the main soil indicators and fruit quality around the grape plant root system. The results showed that after applying humic acid fertilizer to ’Summer Black’ grape, the content of hydrolytic nitrogen in the soil around its root system decreased by 5.7% compared to before fertilization. After treatment with clean water, the content decreased by 13.5% compared to before treatment, and the fertilization treatment increased by 7.8 percentage points compared to the control; After applying humic acid fertilizer, the effective phosphorus content increased by 9.1% compared to before fertilization, increased by 4.8% compared to before treatment after water treatment, and increased by 4.3 percentage points compared to the control; After applying humic acid fertilizer, the content of available potassium increased by 3.1% compared to before fertilization, while the control water treatment increased by 2.6% compared to before treatment. The fertilization treatment increased by 0.5 percentage points compared to the control. After applying humic acid fertilizer, the water-soluble salt content decreased by 82.4% compared to before fertilization, and the control water treatment decreased by 500% compared to before treatment. The difference in fertilizer treatment compared to the control was 32.4 percentage points, indicating a significant salt reduction effect; The soil pH also slightly decreased, and after applying humic acid fertilizer, it decreased from 7.7 to 7.4 compared to before fertilization. After applying humic acid compound fertilizer, the grain weight, ear weight, and soluble solid content of ’Summer Black’ grape increased by 13.09%, 13.29%, and 13.11% compared to the control, respectively, which has a significant positive effect on improving the quality of grape fruit‘ After applying humic acid compound fertilizer to the seedless white chicken heart grape, the organic matter content in the soil around the root system increased by 1.9 percentage points compared to the control. The grain weight, ear weight, and soluble solid content of the seedless white chicken heart grape increased by 15.20%, 10.16%, and 1.70% respectively compared to the control, which also had a significant positive effect on improving fruit quality.
参考文献/References:
［1］（国家农业部.中国农业统计资料：2015［M］.北京：中国农业出版社出版，2016.[2]刘凤之.中国葡萄栽培现状与发展趋势[J].落叶果树，2017，49(1)：1-4.[3]刘寅喆，于祎飞，刘俊，等.葡萄产业现状与发展对策研究[J].河北林业科技，2019（2）：50-56.[4]杨志彦，李正勇，潘启明.葡萄的营养特性及科学施肥技术[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒，2004(5)：30-31.[5]杨艳香，吕艳霞，郑小妹.葡萄的需肥特点与施肥技术研究[J].农业技术与装备，2019（11）：97-98.[6]陈志强，孟红果，梁巍，等.葡萄周年施肥的时间及施肥种类[J].河北果树，2019（1）：31.[7]崔元培，魏子鲲，王建忠，等.“双减”背景下化肥、农药施用现状及发展路径[J].北方园艺，2021（9）：164-173.[8]王曰鑫，李强.论腐植酸肥料及有关研究课题[J].腐植酸，2020(3):19-24.[9]刘征捷.腐殖酸及腐殖酸肥的性质与应用[J].化工管理，2021（9）：73-74，86.[10](齐鹰博，尹微，罗利艳，等.增施腐殖酸生物有机肥在玉米生产中的应用效果[J].肥料与健康，2023，50（4）：51-54.[11]赫臣，郑桂萍，赵海成，等.增施腐殖酸及减量施肥对盐碱地水稻穗部性状与产量的影响[J].作物杂志，2018（3）：129-134.[12]曹松华，李勇.含腐殖酸水溶肥在棉花上的施用效果[J].农村科技，2018（7）：32-33.[13]杨自超，杨博兰，冯梦喜，等.腐殖酸复合肥在花生上的应用效果研究[J].肥料与健康，2021，48（4）：67-69.[14]蒋雪荣，苏顺英，秦干全.小白菜施用含腐殖酸水溶肥料肥效试验初报[J].南方园艺，2018，29（5）：24-26.[15]郑镇勇.温室黄瓜施用含腐殖酸肥料的效果研究[J].现代农业科技，2021（9）：58-59.[16]罗利艳，尹微，田佳美，等.含腐殖酸复合肥对番茄植株生长及产量的影响[J].肥料与健康，2023，50（2）：48-50.[17]梁夕金，盛学荣，杨晶，等.腐殖酸肥料对油蟠桃生长结果的影响[J].西北园艺，2022（10）：52-53.[18]崔金洲，雒家其，王香玉，等.腐殖酸螯合肥在苹果上的应用效果[J].林业科技，2018（24）：89-91.[19]陈屏昭，杜红波，秦燕芬，等.果蔬品含酸量测定方法的改进及其应用[J].浙江农业科学，2013(4):451-453,456.[20]潘俊勇.寒地化肥减量使用技术[J].现代农业科技，2017（9）：220-222.[21]曾彦粤.在葡萄生产中“双减”替代技术措施与应用[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒，2016（5）：71-72；74.[22]吉沐祥，毛妮妮，彭燕琼，等.鲜食葡萄绿色发展目标与“双减”增效关键技术[J].江苏农业科学，2018（4）：143-147.[23]吕涛，张晓霞，黄莎，等.葡萄腐植酸专用肥对葡萄的产量和品质的影响[J].腐殖酸，2003（6）：22-27.[24]张锦强，苏学德，李鹏程，等.不同肥料配施对克瑞森葡萄根区土壤微生态的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报，2022(2)：104-110.[25]李鹏程，苏雪德，王晶晶，等.腐殖酸肥与菌肥配施对果园土壤性质及葡萄产量、品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料，2018(1)：121-126.
相似文献/References:
[1]商全玉,杨秀峰,王万霞,等.氮磷供给对高寒地区水稻产量及干物质积累的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(09):43.
SHANG Quan-yu,YANG Xiu-feng,WANG Wan-xia,et al.Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphate Supply on Yield and Substance Accumulation of Rice in Alpine Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(08):43.
[2]杨广东,张亚芝,魏淑红,等.种植密度对粒用芸豆的产量及商品品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(12):24.
YANG Guang-dong,ZHANG Ya-zhi,WEI Shu-hong,et al.Effect of Different Planting Density on Yield and Commodity Quality of Kidney Bean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(08):24.
[3]张伟东,周高飞,孔庆华.黑龙江省高寒地区米豆增产的思考[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(04):144.
ZHANG Wei-dong,ZHOU Gao-fei,KONG Qing-hua.Thinking on Increasing Yield of Maize and Soybean in Cold Regions of Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(08):144.
[4]杨广东,王强,孟宪欣,等.高寒地区密度对中粒芸豆产量及品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(07):20.
YANG Guang-dong,WANG Qiang,MENG Xian-xin,et al.Effect of Density on Yield and Quality of Medium Grain Kidney Bean in Frigid Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(08):20.
[5]张含生,张建全,杨春梅,等.伊春地区矮丛蓝莓越冬防寒方法比较试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(12):76.
ZHANG Han-sheng,ZHANG Jian-quan,YANG Chun-mei,et al.The Comparison Test of Cold-resisting Cultivation Methods of Lowbush Blueberry in Yichun Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(08):76.
[6]李景春,王绍滨,张太民,等. 我国北部高寒地区谷子新品种的试验与推广利用[J].黑龙江农业科学,1991,(05):10.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1991.05.0010]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,1991,(08):10.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1991.05.0010]
[7]杨广东,胡尊艳,刘玲玲,等.高寒地区不同氮肥水平对高粱产量和品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(06):43.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.06.0043]
YANG Guang-dong,HU Zun-yan,LIU Ling-ling,et al.Effect of Different Nitrogen on Yield and Quality of Sorghum in Frigid Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(08):43.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.06.0043]
[8]文东风,刘忠诚,吕海峰,等. 高寒地区玉米大双覆技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,1997,(06):39.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1997.06.0039]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,1997,(08):39.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1997.06.0039]
[9]张革,刘绍艳. 大兴安岭高寒地区超早熟大豆综合丰产技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,1999,(05):29.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1999.05.0029]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,1999,(08):29.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1999.05.0029]
[10]张广生.高寒地区日光温室油桃栽培技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,2008,(04):159.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.04.0159]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2008,(08):159.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.04.0159]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2023-02-07