LI Hong-xi,QIAO Qi,KANG Zhan-fang,et al.Establishment of the APH Evaluation System and Application in Variety Breeding for Acer griseum[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2018,(12):85-89.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2018.12.0085]
血皮槭AHP评价体系的建立及品种选育中的应用
- Title:
- Establishment of the APH Evaluation System and Application in Variety Breeding for Acer griseum
- Keywords:
- Acer griseum; APH evaluation system; variety breeding
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为促进血皮槭的推广和发展，通过AHP综合评价体系，对血皮槭品种选育相关的14个评价因子进行了层次分析和权重值排序。在该评价体系中，各个指标相对重要性的权重、各指标的评价标准及划分等级标准，构成血皮槭品种选育中完善的评价体系。在各个评价指标中，秋季叶色（P1）、树干颜色（P7）、变叶时间（P2）、冠型（P9）四项指标占到总目标权重的50.91%，说明其观赏价值是血皮槭品种选育中最重要的因素。此次综合评价为Ⅰ级（＞4.0）的有4个单株，分别是XY-SC008、XY-Q007、XY-S004和XY-T023，说明其具备新品种培育的价值。
- Abstract:
- In order to promote the popularization and development of Acer griseum，using Analytic Hierarchy Process (APH),14 evaluation factors related to the variety breeding of Acer griseum were selected by hierarchical analysis and the ranking of weight values.In this evaluation system,the weight of each index’s relative importance,the evaluation criteria of each index and the classification standard constitute a perfect evaluation system for the variety breeding of A.griseum.Leaf color in autumn(P1),stem color(P7),changing time of leaf color(P2) and crown type(P9) accounted for 50.91% of the total target weight in each evaluation index,indicating that the ornamental value was the key factor for the variety breeding of A.griseum.4 individual plants were selected for for the first class(> 4.0),namely XY-SC008,XY-Q007,XY-S004 and XY-T023 respectively,indicating that they have the high value for new variety breeding.
参考文献/References:
［1］中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志第46卷[M].北京:科学出版社,1981.[2]Forrest M.Tree collections in Ireland[J].Irish Forestry，1998,55(2):88-92.[3]Widrlechner M P,Thompson J R,Kapler E J,et al.A test of four models to predict the risk of naturalization of non-native woody plants in the Chicago region[M].Journal of Environmental Horticulture，2009,241-250.[4]Klingeman W E.Bagworm survival and feeding preferences as indicators of resistance among maples[J].Journal of Environmental Horticulture，2002,20(3):138-142.[5]何晓燕,包志毅.英国引种家威尔逊引种中国园林植物种质资源及其影响[J].浙江林业科技,2005,25(3):56-61.[6]叶学敏,于雪丹,付启迪，等.血皮槭叶绿体DNA非编码区差异序列筛选和分析[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(4):674-678.[7]陈秋红,计青鹤,史琼芳,等.槭树科树种在栾川县苗木产业中的应用及分析[J].农家科技,2014,11(2):172-173.[8]陈朋,于雪丹,张川红，等.中国特有种血皮槭的天然更新[J].林业科学,2013,49(3):159-164.[9]李红喜,孟庆法,张保卫，等.河南伏牛山血皮槭资源调查与分析[J].河南林业科技,2017(2):23-25.[10]汪松,解焱.中国物种红色目录[M].北京: 高等教育出版社,2004.[11]赵焕臣.层次分析法[M].北京: 科学出版社,1986.[12]王瑛,赵慧英.彩叶树在城市园林绿化中的应用[J].农业科技与信息: 现代园林,2009(5):13-16.[13]黄彦青,徐祥渊,陈玮，等.基于层次分析法的大连市彩叶树种引种综合评价[J].北方园艺,2012(16):79-82.[14]杨强胜,张化珍,乔埃虎，等.26种园林树木观赏性综合评价[J].北方农业学报,2008(2):69-71.[15]李玉娟,张健,王莹，等.美国红枫AHP综合评价体系的建立及其在品种选育中的应用[J].现代农业科技,2016(21):118-119.
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2018-09-18