LI Liu-liu,GE Ren-jie,WANG Ya-li,et al.Effects of Drought Stress on Protective Enzymes Activitiesof Scutellaria baicalensis Seedlings[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2018,(12):14-16.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2018.12.0014]
干旱胁迫对黄芩幼苗保护酶活性的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Drought Stress on Protective Enzymes Activitiesof Scutellaria baicalensis Seedlings
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为探索陕西黄芩抵御干旱的生理机制，采用水培的方法，用不同浓度的PEG-6000模拟不同干旱胁迫，通过测定黄芩幼苗叶片保护酶（SOD、POD、CAT）的活性，研究黄芩幼苗对干旱的响应。结果表明：伴随着干旱胁迫程度的加剧，3种酶活性均呈现为先升高后降低趋势，在PEG-6000浓度为7.5%达到最高，SOD活性为 82.86 U?g-1，CAT活性为42.06 U?g-1，POD活性为9.37 U?g-1。表明适度的干旱胁迫能提高黄芩幼苗体内的保护酶活性。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the physiological mechanism of Scutellaria to resist drought,in this study,the response of Scutellaria baicalensis seedlings to drought was studied by using different concentrations of PEG-6000 to simulate different drought stress and to determine the activities of SOD,POD and CAT in the leaves of S.baicalensis seedlings.The results showed that with the intensification of drought stress,the activities of the three enzymes increased first and then decreased,the concentration of PEG-6000 was 7.5%,the activity of SOD was 82.86 U?g-1,the activity of CAT was 42.06 U?g-1,and POD activity was 9.37 U?g-1.Therefore,moderate drought stress could enhance the activities of protective enzymes in S.baicalensis seedlings.
参考文献/References:
［1］王兴顺.黄芩(Scutellaria baicalensis)幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理适应性反应[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(1):55-59.[2]张榕.干旱胁迫对黄芩黄酮类成分含量的影响、机制及其应用[D].上海：复旦大学,2010.[3]姜雪.水因子对黄芩黄酮类代谢影响研究[D].长春：吉林农业大学,2013.[4]赵胜楠.水因子对黄芩药材质量及产量的影响研究[D].长春：吉林农业大学,2013.[5]张永刚,赵胜楠,李亚芹,等.短期干旱复水对不同施水黄芩药材质量的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2013,35(4):433-437.[6]杨兆春,袁媛,陈敏.PEG胁迫对黄芩黄酮类有效成分积累及相关基因表达的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2011(16):9-13.[7]郭玲玲,刘毅,禄梦杰,等.HPLC法同时测定陕西产不同生长年限野生和栽培黄芩中9种化学成分的含量[J].中草药,2018,49(4):935-940.[8]潘燕,孟庆刚,高明,等.不同种源黄芩的质量比较研究[J].辽宁中医杂志，2012,39(4):717-718.[9]龚子端,李高阳.PEG干旱胁迫对植物的影响[J].河南林业技,2006(3):23-25.〖ZK)〗[10]曹慧,王孝威.水分胁迫下新红星苹果超氧化自由基累积和膜脂过氧化作用[J].果树学报,2001,18(4):196-199.[11]袁媛,李娜,邵爱娟,等.PEG-6000处理对黄芩种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].中草药,2008,39(2):269-272.[12]陈立松,刘星辉.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片糖代谢的影响及其与抗旱性的关系[J].热带作物学报,1999(2):31-36.[13]谢亚军,王兵,梁新华,等.干旱胁迫对甘草幼苗活性氧代谢及保护酶活性的影响[J].农业科学研究报,2008,29(4):19-22.[14]王翠花,孙志刚,杨晓松,等.PEG处理对大豆叶片抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].内蒙古民族大学学报,2005,20(5):523-526.[15]闫秀峰,李晶,祖元刚,等.干旱胁迫对红松幼苗保护酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的影响[J].生态学报,1999,19(6):850-854.[16]陈晓亚，薛红卫.植物生理与分子生物学[M].4版.北京:科学出版社,2012:629.[17]袁梦雅.干旱胁迫对植物保护酶的影响[J].科技信息,2011(14):105.[18]严子柱,李得禄,满多清,等.PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对铃铛刺和披针叶野决明种子萌发的影响[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(1):88-94.[19]裴宗平,余莉琳,汪云甲,等.4种干旱区生态修复植物的苗期抗旱性研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(3):204-208.[20]王琰,陈建文,狄晓艳.水分胁迫下不同油松种源SOD、POD、MDA及可溶性蛋白比较研究[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(10):1449-1453.
相似文献/References:
[1]张磊,孙慧颖,高荣,等.不同浓度PEG模拟干旱胁迫对大叶铁线莲的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(07):69.
ZHANG Lei,SUN Hui-ying,GAO Rong,et al.Effect of Different Concentration PEG Simulating DroughtStress on the Clematis heracleifolia[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(12):69.
[2]牛同旭,郑桂萍,吕艳东,等.寒地水稻种质资源芽期抗旱性筛选与评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2018,(01):1.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2018.01.0001]
NIU Tong-xu,ZHENG Gui-ping,LYU Yan-dong,et al.Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Rice Germplasm Resources in Cold Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2018,(12):1.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2018.01.0001]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2018-08-15