SHANG Bai-xiao.River Vegetation Zone Assessment and Protection Countermeasures of Fanhe Basin[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(07):98-101.
凡河流域河流植被评价及保护对策
- Title:
- River Vegetation Zone Assessment and Protection Countermeasures of Fanhe Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1002-2767（2014）07-0098-04
- 分类号:
- X176
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
-
为加强河流植被修复及保护，通过对河流植被的现状调查，采用河岸带植被缓冲区宽度、河岸带植被缓冲区纵向连续性及植被覆盖丰富度3个指标对凡河流域河流植被进行评价。结果表明：凡河流域植被健康综合指数为0.21~0.76；黄河子断面的植被健康等级很健康；夹河厂、老边台及树芽屯断面的植被健康等级为健康；岱海寨、榛子岭、小屯及凡河站断面植被健康等级为亚健康；仅杨坟沟断面植被状况为不健康。
- Abstract:
-
In order to strengthen restoration and protection of river vegetation，based on the investigation of river vegetation including the riparian vegetation buffer width,longitudinal continuity and the vegetation fraction richness,the river vegetation zone of Fanhe basin was evaluated.The results showed that the vegetation health comprehensive index of Fanhe basin was between 0.21~0.76.The vegetation health level of Hanghezi section was very healthy,Jiahechang,Laobiantai and Shuyatun sections were healthy,Daihaizhai,Zhenziling,Xiaotun and Fanhezhan sections were subhealth,and only Yangfengou section was unhealthy.
参考文献/References:
[1]尚宗波，高琼.流域生态学——生态学研究的一个新领域[J].生态学报，2001，21（3）：468-472.
[2]Barbour M,Gerritsen J,Snyder B,et al.Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and Wad eable rivers:Periphyton,Benthic Macroinvertebrates,and Fish(2nd edition)［EB/OL］.2012-05-07.http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/techmon.html,1999.
[3]Parsons M,Thoms M C,Norris R H.Development of a standardized approach to river habitat assessment inAustralia[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2004,98:109-130.
[4]夏继红，严忠民,蒋传丰.河岸带生态系统综合评价指标体系研究[J].水科学进展，2005，16（3）：345-348.
[5]王劲修，齐实民，王惠，等.山西沁河上游河岸植被缓冲带评价与恢复重建研究[J].湖南农业科学，2011（11）：115-119.
[6]诸葛亦斯，刘德富，黄钰铃.生态河流缓冲带构建技术初探[J].水资源与水工程学报，2006，17（2）：63-67.
[7]赵广琦，崔心红，张群，等.河岸带植被重建的生态修复技术及应用[J].水土保持研究，2010，17（1）：252-258.
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2014-03-27
基金项目：国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项资助项目（2012ZX07505-00105）
作者简介：尚佰晓（1980-），男，山东省郯城县人，硕士，工程师，从事生态恢复及环境监理方面的研究。E-mail：bxshang@sina.com。