[1]赵秀梅,李清泉,谭可菲,等.糜子田土壤处理除草剂安全性与药效筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(03):73-78.
　ZHAO Xiu-mei,LI Qing-quan,TAN Ke-fei,et al.Safety and Efficacy Screening Tests of Herbicide in Millet Field Soil Treatment[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(03):73-78.
点击复制

糜子田土壤处理除草剂安全性与药效筛选试验

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2012年03 页码: 73-78 栏目: 出版日期: 2012-03-01
Title:
Safety and Efficacy Screening Tests of Herbicide in Millet Field Soil Treatment
文章编号:
1002-2767（2012）03-0073-06
作者:
赵秀梅; 李清泉; 谭可菲; 刘 洋; 王立达; 武琳琳; 李青超
黑龙江省农业科学院 齐齐哈尔分院，黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161006
Author(s):
ZHAO Xiu-mei; LI Qing-quan; TAN Ke-fei; LIU Yang; WANG Li-da; WU Lin-lin; LI Qing-chao
Qiqihar Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Qiqihar，Heilongjiang 161006
关键词:
糜子; 土壤处理; 除草剂; 安全性; 药效
Keywords:
millet; soil treatment; herbicide; safety; efficacy
分类号:
S451.22+3
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过在糜子田播后苗前，选择常用的75%噻吩磺隆水分散粒剂、72%2，4-D丁酯乳油、50%扑草净可湿性粉剂、45%扑津·西草净可湿性粉剂、330 g·L-1二甲戊灵乳油、960 g·L-1异丙甲草胺乳油和38%莠去津悬浮剂7种土壤处理除草剂，分别设低、中、高量进行安全性及防效筛选试验。结果表明：45%扑津·西草净可湿性粉剂安全性最高，并且株防效和鲜重防效均达90%以上，建议用量为2 250～2 475 kg·hm-2；其次是50%扑草净可湿性粉剂和38%莠去津悬浮剂，建议用量分别为50%扑草净可湿性粉剂750～900 g·hm-2，38%莠去津悬浮剂3 750～4 500 mL·hm-2；330 g·L-1二甲戊灵乳油和960 g·L-1异丙甲草胺乳油药害严重，不可应用于糜子田化学除草；75%噻吩磺隆水分散粒剂及72%2，4-D丁酯乳油对禾本科杂草无效，不推荐单独应用。
Abstract:
After sowing and before emergence in the millet field，Selecting seven common soil treatments herbicide for 75% Thifensulfuron-methl WG，72% 2，4-D butylate EC，50% Prometryn WP，45% Propazine-Simetryn WP，330 g·L-1Pendimethalin EC，960 g·L-1Metolachlor EC，38% Atrazine SC，setting low，medium and high levels，the efficiency for security and anti-screening test was conduccted .The results showed that:the best security was 45% Propazine-Simetryn WP，and plant control effect and fresh weight control effect reached over 90%，the proposed amount was 2 250～2 475 kg·hm-2;followed by 50% Prometryn WP and 38% Atrazine SC，the proposed amount of 50% Prometryn WP was 750～900 g·hm-2，the proposed amount of 38% Atrazine SC was 3 750～4 500 mL·hm-2;330 g·L-1Pendimethalin EC and 960 g·L-1Metolachlor EC showed serious phytotoxicity，They could not be used in millet field of chemical weed control;75% Thifensulfuron-methl WG and 72% 2，4-D butylate EC were invalid for grass weeds，they were not recommended applications alone.

参考文献/References:

[1]柴岩.糜子（黄米）的营养和生产概况[J].粮食加工，2009，34（4）：90-91.

[2]徐晓艺，刘敏，郝明远，等.糜子高产栽培技术及用途[J].农业科技通讯，2010（10）：171-172.

[3]唐韵.除草剂使用技术[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2010.

[4]徐映明，朱文达.农药问答[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2011.

[5]黄桂潮.中国东北地区主要杂草图谱[M].日本：全国农村教育协会，1988.

[6]刘建勇.旱地糜子田化学除草试验[J].陕西农业科学，2000（5）：29-30.

[7]农业部农药检定所.农药田间药效试验准则（一）[M].北京：中国标准出版社，2000.


相似文献/References:

[1]王宇先.半干旱区糜子前氮后移技术验证试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(04):43.
　WANG Yu xian.Demonstration Test of N Ferticizer Applicated at Late Growth Stage for Millet in Semiarid Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(03):43.
[2]王宇先,李清泉,刘玉涛,等.半干旱区不同施氮量对糜子产量及品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(03):24.
　WANG Yu-xian,LI Qing-quan,LIU Yu-tao,et al.The Effect of Different Nitrogen Rates on Yield and Quality of Broomcorn Millet in Semi-arid Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(03):24.
[3]王宇先,李清泉,刘玉涛,等.不同播期对糜子生长发育及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(09):22.
　WANG Yu-xian,LI Qing-quan,LIU Yu-tao,et al.The Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Growing Development of Panicum miliaceum L.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(03):22.
[4]刘 峰.糜子农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(03):15.
　LIU Feng.Genetic Diversity Analysis of Broomcorn Millet Based on Agronomic Traitsbroomcorn millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):15.
[5]刘 峰,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.糜子新品种齐黍1号选育及栽培要点[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(06):166.
　LIU Feng,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Breeding and Cultivation Main Points of New Broomcorn Millet Variety Qishu No.1[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):166.
[6]闫 锋,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.糜子主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(05):37.
　YAN Feng,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis of Main Agronomic Character of Broomcorn Millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):37.
[7]王宇先.半干旱地区糜子倒伏系数相关及通径分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(07):31.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.07.0031]
　WANG Yu-xian.Correlation and Path Analysis on Lodging Resistance of Millet in Semi-arid Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(03):31.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.07.0031]
[8]曹晓宁,王君杰,刘思辰,等.间作对糜子干物质积累、农艺性状及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(06):23.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.06.0023]
　CAO Xiao-ning,WANG Jun-jie,LIU Si-chen,et al.Effect of Different Intercropping Planting Patterns on Agronomic Traits，Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Broomcorn Millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(03):23.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.06.0023]
[9]郑艳美,杜金城,郭淑英.花卉土壤处理关键技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,2008,(03):102.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.03.0102]
　ZHENG Yan-mei,DU Jin-cheng,GUO Shu-ying.Key Technology of Soil Amendment of Flower-plants[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2008,(03):102.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.03.0102]
[10]刁淑清,谢志明,韩月明.白城地区不同土壤条件下硅肥对糜子种子萌发代谢的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(11):35.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.11.0038]
　DIAO Shu-qing,XIE Zhi-ming,HAN Yue-ming.Effect of Silicon on Germination Metabolism of Proso Millet Seed Under Different Types of Soil Conditions in Baicheng Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(03):35.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.11.0038]

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家谷子糜子产业技术体系齐齐哈尔综合试验站资助项目（CARS-07-12.5-B14）

第一作者简介：赵秀梅（1970-），女，黑龙江省宝清县人，在读硕士，高级农艺师，从事植物保护与新农药田间应用技术研究。E-mail:zxm0452@126.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-10-26