MENG Xiang-hai,LI Yu-mei,WANG Gen-lin,et al.Effects of Different Farming Methods on the Soil Structure of Meadow Soil[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2019,(07):4-11.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2019.07.0004]
不同耕作方式对草甸土结构变化的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Different Farming Methods on the Soil Structure of Meadow Soil
- Keywords:
- meadow; soil structure; tillage; straw return
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为促进土壤结构改良，通过田间定位试验，从时间和空间尺度上，研究不同耕作与秸秆还田方式对典型旱地草甸土土壤团聚体和土壤容重的季节动态变化的影响。结果表明：不同耕作与培肥方式下，土壤容重均在20~30 cm土层较高，平均1.51 g·cm-3；不同耕作方式，0~40 cm土层拔节期前 NT＜DT＜ST；大喇叭口期至成熟期，NT容重增加；成熟期0~30 cm土层，深翻（1.45 g·cm-3)与浅翻(1.44 g·cm-3)无差异，30~50 cm土层，深翻容重(1.48 g·cm-3)略有增加；免耕秸秆覆盖，0~50 cm土层平均容重(1.42 g·cm-3)，比DT-S和ST-S减少0.03~0.05 g·cm-3；0~30 cm土层，ST-S比＞DT-S增加0.05 g·cm-3，30~50 cm土层，趋势相反。浅翻会造成犁底层上移，0~30 cm容重增加，而深翻增加了40~50 cm土层容重。10~20 cm质地为粉砂质粘土，40~50 cm为粘土，其余土层为壤质粘土；免耕与耕作前土壤团聚体分布更接近，均在>1 mm粒级处出现高峰，而ST与DT处理的波动性变化比较接近，NT处理在40~50 cm土层的0.5~1.0和3.0~5.0 mm粒径土粒含量明显高于ST与DT处理。横向比较，不同耕作方式下，团聚体分布不同；纵向比较，同一耕作方式，无论秸秆还田与否，不同粒级团聚体的波动性变化趋势一致。综合可知，土壤团聚体的机械稳定性受耕作方式影响较大，短期耕作与秸秆还田方式对土壤理化性状的影响虽受年季间的影响发生变化。
- Abstract:
-
In order to promote soil structure improvement,the effects of different tillage and straw mulching methods on the seasonal dynamic changes of soil aggregates and soil bulk density in typical upland meadow soils were studied through field location experiments on time and space scales.The results showed that under different tillage and fertilizer cultivation methods,the bulk density of soil was higher in the soil layer of 20-30 cm,with an average of 1.51 g·cm-3.Different tillage methods,0-40 cm soil layer NT
DT-S,and the trend was opposite in the 30-50 cm soil layer.Shallow turning will cause the bottom layer of plough to move upward,and the bulk density of 0-30 cm will increase,while deep turning will increase the bulk density of 40-50 cm soil layer.The texture of 10-20 cm was silty clay,40-50 cm was clay,and the remaining soil layer was loamy clay.The distribution of soil aggregates was closer to that of soil aggregates before no-tillage and tillage,and they all peaked at>and 1 mm grain size,while the fluctuation of ST and DT treatment was close,and the content of soil particles with particle size of 0.5-1.0 and 3.0-5.0 mm in the soil layer with NT treatment was significantly higher than that of ST and DT treatment.The distribution of aggregates was different under different tillage methods.Longitudinal comparison showed that the variation trend of aggregates with different grain size was consistent with the same tillage method,no matter whether straw was returned to the field or not.It can be concluded that the mechanical stability of soil aggregates is greatly affected by tillage methods.Although the influences of short-term tillage and straw mulching on soil physical and chemical properties change from year to season,they provide scientific basis for the comprehensive supporting measures such as tillage and fertilizer cultivation in agricultural production.
参考文献/References:
［1］黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京：中国农业出版社，2000:121-125.
相似文献/References:
[1]李琬,李炜,肖佳雷,等.黑龙江省西部地区大豆胞囊线虫病物理防治技术研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(03):56.
LI Wan,LI Wei,XIAO Jia lei,et al.Research on Physical Control Technology of Soybean Cyst Nematode in Western Region of Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(07):56.
[2]赵 杨,钱春荣,王俊河,等.不同种植方式对玉米农艺性状和产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(01):32.
ZHAO Yang,QIAN Chun-rong,WANG Jun-he,et al.Effect of Different Planting Patterns on Maize Agronomic Traits and Yield[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(07):32.
[3]张 哲,麻 琳,魏 丹.嫩江县不同种植模式对土壤肥力影响的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(12):34.
ZHANG Zhe,MA Lin,WEI Dan.Study of Different Plant Modes on Soil FertilityImprovement in Nenjiang County[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(07):34.
[4]刘玉涛,王宇先,张树权,等.耕作方式对半干旱地区玉米生长和产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(07):19.
LIU Yu-tao,WANG Yu-xian,ZHANG Shu-quan,et al.Effects of Tillage Managements on the Yield and Growthof Maize in Semiarid Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(07):19.
[5]陈雪丽,王玉峰,张 磊.生物型水稻专用肥在草甸土上的应用效果研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(12):41.
CHEN Xue-li,WANG Yu-feng,ZHANG Lei.Application Effects of Biotype Rice Specific Fertilizer in Meadow Soils[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(07):41.
[6]王辉,刘兴焱,何长安,等.垄改平对土壤水分及玉米产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(10):23.
WANG Hui,LIU Xing-yan,HE Chang-an,et al.Effect of Different Tillage Managements on Soil Moisture and Yield of Maize[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(07):23.
[7]李玉影,刘双全,吴 英,等.长期施钾对草甸土钾素动态变化及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2002,(01):26.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2002.01.0026]
LI Yu-ying,LIU Shuang-quan,WU Ying,et al.Effect of Potash Application on the Dynamic Change of Potassium Content in Meadow Soil and Crops Yield[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2002,(07):26.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2002.01.0026]
[8]高 盼,刘玉涛,杨慧莹,等.半干旱地区不同耕作方式对土壤水分含量和温度及玉米产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(10):19.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.10.0019]
GAO Pan,LIU Yu-tao,YANG Hui-ying,et al.Effects of Different Tillage Measures on Water Content of Soil and Temperature of Soil and the Yield of Maize in Semi-arid Regions[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(07):19.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.10.0019]
[9]李 梁,于 洋,姜宇博,等.寒地玉米不同耕作方式下土壤水热动态[J].黑龙江农业科学,2017,(02):31.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.02.0026]
LI Liang,YU Yang,JIANG Yu-bo,et al.Dynamic of Soil Moisture and Temperature Under Different Tillage Patterns of Maize in Cold Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2017,(07):31.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.02.0026]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2019-04-01