HUA Mingyang,SUN Zhonglin,GAO Kai.Plastic Response of Life History Traits and Material Allocation to Heterotopia of Life History of Cenchrus spinifex Cav.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(10):30-35.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.10.0030]
少花蒺藜草生活史性状和物质分配对生活史异位的可塑响应
- Title:
- Plastic Response of Life History Traits and Material Allocation to Heterotopia of Life History of Cenchrus spinifex Cav.
- 文章编号:
- 6
- Keywords:
- Cenchrus spinifex Cav.; phenotypic plasticity; life history; material allocation; seed functional traits
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 少花蒺藜草（Cenchrus spinifex Cav.）是我国北方主要入侵植物之一，自然条件下具有出苗不同步的特性，生活史在时间上异位的现象普遍存在，对农牧业生产具有深远影响。为了探究少花蒺藜草营养和繁殖期时间及比例，物质分配和种子功能性状对生活史异位的响应，本研究通过建立野外原位试验地，采用人工播种刺苞的方式获得生活史异位的少花蒺藜草种群，观察并比较分析5个生育期下少花蒺藜草生活史性状和物质分配的差异。结果表明，出苗时间对少花蒺藜草营养期、繁殖期时间和生育期以及营养期和繁殖期时间占比有显著影响（P<0.05），随出苗时间延后，生育期逐渐缩短，繁殖期时间占比增大；生育期缩短显著降低了果穗生物量、刺苞生物量和数量，但对单刺苞质量无显著影响；少花蒺藜草茎叶比、根冠比和繁殖分配比在5个生育期下差异显著，生育期缩短导致少花蒺藜草茎叶比显著减小，繁殖分配和根冠比显著增大。少花蒺藜草通过调整其主要生活史性状和物质分配适应生育期缩短带来的不利影响，其生育期长度，物质分配和种子功能性状均有一定可塑性。生育期缩短导致的积温和降水等环境因子的限制可能是少花蒺藜草生活史性状和物质分配差异的重要因素。
- Abstract:
- Cenchrus spinifex Cav. is one of the main invasive plants in northern China. C. spinifex Cav. shows asynchronous emergence under natural conditions， and the phenomenon of life history heterotopic is common and has a profound impact on agricultural production and animal husbandry. In this study， a field experiment was established to investigate the response of the nutritional and reproductive period duration and proportion， material allocation， and seed functional traits to the heterotopic life history of C. spinifex Cav.， and the population of C. spinifex Cav. with a heterotopic life history was obtained by artificially sowing spiny burs of C. spinifex Cav. The life history traits and material allocation of C. spinifex Cav. were analyzed and compared under 5 life-history lengths， and the response of the main life history components and material allocation to heterotopic life history was explored. The results showed that germination time had a significant effect on the duration of the nutritional， reproductive， and growth periods， as well as on the proportion of the nutritional and reproductive periods of C. spinifex Cav. With the extension of emergence time， the growth period gradually shortened， and the proportion of reproductive period duration gradually increased. The shortening of the growth period significantly reduced the spike biomass， spiny bur biomass and number of C. spinifex Cav. plants， but had no significant effect on the weight of a single spikelet. There were significant differences in the stem-leaf ratio， reproductive allocation， and root-shoot ratio among the 5 growth periods. The shortened growth period resulted in a significant decrease in the stem-leaf ratio， while reproductive allocation and the root-shoot ratio significantly increased. C. spinifex Cav. adapts to the adverse effects of a shortened growth period by adjusting its main life history traits， material allocation and seed functional traits， which have a certain degree of plasticity. The limitation imposed by environmental factors such as accumulated temperature and precipitation caused by the shortening of the growth period may be an important factor leading to differences in life history traits and material allocation in C. spinifex Cav.
参考文献/References:
［1］CLEEMPUT E V，MEERBEEK K V，HELSEN K，et al.Remotely sensed plant traits can provide insights into ecosystem impacts of plant invasions：a case study covering two functionally different invaders[J].Biological Invasions，2020，22(6)：3533-3550.[2]徐军，李青丰，王树彦.科尔沁沙地蒺藜草属植物种名使用建议[J].杂草科学，2011，29(4)：1-4.[3]孙忠林，淑琴，高凯，等.少花蒺藜草入侵现状，适应机制和防控策略[J].草地学报，2020，28(5)：1196-1202.[4]张福胜，姚影.通辽地区外来入侵植物少花蒺藜草发生情况与防治措施[J].北方农业学报，2018，46(5)：98-101.[5]张小丽，陈泽柠，武正军.气候变化情景下少花蒺藜草在中国的分布区变化[J].广西植物，2022，43(4)：658-669.[6]杜广明，曹凤芹，刘文斌，等.辽宁省草场的少花蒺藜草及其危害[J].中国草地，1995(3)：71-73.[7]王坤芳.三种植物与入侵植物少花蒺藜草的竞争效应[J].湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版)，2021，39(2)：134-138.[8]周全来，王正文，齐凤林，等.少花蒺藜草生物生态学特征与综合防除策略[J].生态学杂志，2021，40(8)：2593-2600.[9]周立业，刘海宇，高鸿蒙，等.少花蒺藜草全生育期生长特性研究[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版)，2012，27(6)：674-676，679.〖ZK)〗[10]徐军.外来入侵植物：少花蒺藜草的分布与生物学特性研究[D].呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2011.[11]曲智.辽宁省少花蒺藜草发生概况与防控建议[J].中国植保导刊，2021，41(4)：79-80，84.[12]王姝，周道玮.植物表型可塑性研究进展[J].生态学报，2017，37(24)：8161-8169.[13]淑琴，孙忠林，马崇勇，等.科尔沁沙地 4 种生境少花蒺藜草表型特征和生物量分配[J].草业科学，2023，40(2)：329-337.[14]张志新，田迅.干旱和灌溉条件下少花蒺藜草分株生物量分配特征[J].草业科学，2011，28(2)：185-188.[15]张志新，章恺，田迅.干旱与灌溉生境下少花蒺藜草生物构件的特征[J].草业科学，2012，29(12)：1899-1902.[16]SULTAN S E.Phenotypic plasticity for plant development，function and life history[J].Trends in Plant Science，2000，5(12)：537-542.[17]DIGGLE P K.The expression of andromonoecy in Solanum 〖JP4〗hirtum (Solanaceae)：phenotypic plasticity and ontogenetic contingency[J].American Journal of Botany，1994，81(10)：1354-1354.[18]PIGLIUCCI 〖KG(0.35mm〗M.Ontogenetic phenotypic plasticity 〖KG)〗during the reproductive phase in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae)[J].American Journal of Botany，1997，84(7)：887-895.[19]SULTAN 〖KG(0.3mm〗S E.Promising directions in plant 〖KG)〗phenotypic plasticity[J].Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics，2004，6(4)：227-233.[20]张宝成，孙晴，黄小桐，等.不同大小入侵小飞蓬资源分配特性[J].江苏农业科学，2022，50(5)：107-113.[21]GALLOWAY L F.Response to natural environmental heterogeneity：maternal effects and selection on life-history characters and plasticities in Mimulus guttatus[J].Evolution，1995，49(6)：1095-1107.[22]WANG Z R，BASKIN J M，BASKIN C C，et al.Great granny still ruling from the grave：phenotypical response of plant performance and seed functional traits to salt stress affects multiple generations of a halophyte[J].Journal of Ecology，2021，110(1):117-128.[23]刘金平，游明鸿，段婧，等.水分胁迫下雌雄异株植物葎草繁殖策略的可塑性调节[J].草业学报，2015，24(3)：226-232.[24]张亦默，王卿，卢蒙，等.中国东部沿海互花米草种群生活史特征的纬度变异与可塑性[J].生物多样性，2008，16(5)：462-469.[25]张世航，龚莉，戈玉莹，等.不同密度下入侵植物北美车前生物量分配与异速生长关系[J].草业科学，2021，38(10)：1938-1949.[26]张衍雷.少花蒺藜草遗传多样性及萌发、繁殖特性研究[D].北京：中国农业科学院，2015.[27]王连喜，陈怀亮，李琪，等.植物物候与气候研究进展[J].生态学报，2010，30(2)：447-454.[28]BASKIN J M，LU J J，BASKIN C C，et al.Diaspore dispersal ability and degree of dormancy in heteromorphic species of cold deserts of northwest China：a review[J].Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics，2014，16(2)：93-99.[29]王君，及利，张忠辉，等.不同土壤基质下水分胁迫对蒙古栎幼苗表型可塑性的影响[J].生态学杂志，2019，38(1)：51-59.[30]翟偲涵，王平，盛连喜.竞争条件下植物功能性状的表型可塑性研究进展[J].北华大学学报（自然科学版），2017，18(4)：538-545.[31]范高华，崔桢，张金伟，等.密度对尖头叶藜生物量分配格局及异速生长的影响[J].生态学报，2017，37(15)：5080-5090.[32]潘玉梅，唐赛春，韦春强，等.3种本地植物与入侵植物紫茎泽兰的竞争[J].生态学报，2022，42(6)：2394-2404.[33]谭淑娟，李婷，余素睿，等.光照强度对8种红树植物幼苗生长和生物量分配的影响[J].生态科学，2020，39(3)：139-146.[34]RICHARDS C L，BOSSDORF O，MUTH N Z，et al.Jack of all trades，master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions[J].Ecology Letters，2006，9(8)：981-993.[35]HUFBAUER R A，TORCHIN M E.Integrating ecological and evolutionary theory of biological invasions[J].Biological Invasions，2007(193):79-96.
相似文献/References:
[1]霍艳利,田迅,卢轩,等.入侵植物少花蒺藜草功能叶的生长和资源分配策略[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021,(04):44.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.04.0044]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(10):44.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.04.0044]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2023-07-26