LUO Dan,LIU Zhong-na,XIE Li-juan,et al.Research for Response to High Temperature on Part of Morphological and Physiological Indexes in Rose[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(08):66-72.
月季部分形态生理指标对高温的反应研究
- Title:
- Research for Response to High Temperature on Part of Morphological and Physiological Indexes in Rose
- 文章编号:
- 1002-2767（2013）08-0066-07
- Keywords:
- rose; SOD; MDA; proline; heat resistance
- 分类号:
- S685.12
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了筛选出适合高温条件下生长的月季品种，选定7个具有一定耐热性的品种绯扇、冰山、蓝斯带、香欢喜、红双喜、香水黄和芝加哥和平，通过在深圳高温的温室条件下栽培和鉴定，研究常温和高温对月季品种形态和生理指标的影响。结果表明：在形态方面，7个月季品种高温下，生长比较缓慢，冰山和绯扇的生长相对较好，开花数量和开花质量也较好，而香水黄和芝加哥和平在高温下生长缓慢，不开花；在生理方面，随着温度升高，7个品种均表现为MDA含量增加、SOD活性上升、脯氨酸含量也随温度升高呈增加趋势，高温下耐热性强的品种能保持更高的SOD等保护酶活性和更低的MDA含量，并诱导产生更多的脯氨酸。
- Abstract:
- In order to filter out the variety which could grow suitably in the high temperature,seven varieties with certain heat resistant were selected including Feishan,Iceberg,Blue ribbon,Xianghuanxi,Double delight,Xiangshuihuang,Chicago peace,through the cultivation and identification in the conditions of high temperature in greenhouse located at Shenzhen,some morphological and physiological indicators were measured under normal and high temperatures.The results showed that:in morphology,seven rose varieties grew slowly under the high temperature,Iceberg and Feishan grew better than others,manifested in the number of flower and the quality of flowering,but Xiangshuihuang and Chicago peace grew the most slowly and had no flower;in the physical aspects,as the temperature increases,seven varieties showed an increase in MDA content,SOD activity and proline content,in the high temperature the heat resistant varieties could maintain higher activity of SOD,lower MDA content and induce more proline.
参考文献/References:
[1]李健，蒋昌华，郑艳君，等.高温胁迫下10个月季品种的耐热性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010(12):88-91. [2]胡永红,蒋昌华，秦俊.高温对月季部分形态、生理指标的影响研究[J].种子,2007(10):71-73.
[3]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006：33-34.
[4]汤章城.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的累积及其可能的意义[J].植物生理学通讯,1984(1):15-21.
[5]顾静文.逆境与游离脯氨酸的积累[J].江西科学,1989，7(3):22-26.
[6]范双喜,谷建田,韩莹琰.园艺植物高温逆境生理研究进展[J].北京农学院学报,2003(2):147-151.
[7]Noctor G,Foyer Christine H.Ascorbate and glutathione:Keeping active oxygen under control[J].Annu.Rev.Plant Physiol.Plant Mol.Biol.,1998，49:249-279.
[8]陈立松.植物抗冷性鉴定指标的种类[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997(4):72-77.
[9]姚元干,石雪晖,杨建国.辣椒耐热性与叶片质膜透性及几种生化物质含量的关系[J].湖南农业大学学报,2000，2(26):97-99.
[10]马德华,庞金安,霍振荣.黄瓜对不同温度逆境的抗性研究[J].中国农业科学,1999，5(32):28-35.
[11]曹鸣庆，李岩，蒋涛，等.大白菜和小白菜游离小孢子培养试验简报[J].华北农学报,1992，2(7):119-120. [12]付雅丽,牛瑞生,刘铁铮，等.大白菜游离小孢子培养研究进展[J].河北农业科学,2008，10(12):45-46.
[13]李衍素.豇豆耐热性研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2006：17-19.
[14]杨秋珍.高温胁迫下甜瓜生理生态特性研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2003(1):26-28.
[15]潘光辉,王文强,尹贤贵.电导法鉴定番茄耐热性与田间结果的比较[J].西南园艺,2001(2):26-27.
[16]尹贤贵,罗庆熙,王文强.番茄耐热性鉴定方法研究[J].西南农业学报,2001，2(14):62-65.
[17]张雅,傅鸿妃.高温胁迫对茄子幼苗抗氧化系统和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2010(2):246-250. [18]贾志银.辣椒耐热生理生化特性及谷胱甘肽处理效应研究[D].陕西：西北农林科技大学，2010：8-9.
相似文献/References:
[1]徐婷,周传余,周超,等.Na2CO3胁迫对番茄幼苗生理生化特性的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(04):71.
XU Ting,ZHOU Chuan yu,ZHOU Chao,et al.Effect of Na2CO3 Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Tomoto Seedling[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(08):71.
[2]赵海新.碱胁迫对水稻苗期SOD和POD活性及 MDA含量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(08):22.
ZHAO Hai-xin.Effect of Alkaline Stress on SOD,POD Activity and MDA Content in Rice Seedling Stage[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(08):22.
[3]杨猛,魏湜,庄文锋,等.氮素营养对春小麦旗叶SOD 和POD 活性的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2008,(02):63.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.02.0063]
YANGMeng,WEI Shi,ZHUANG Wen-feng,et al.The Effects of Nitrogen Nutrition on Flag LeafSenescence of Spring Wheat[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2008,(08):63.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2008.02.0063]
[4]谭萍,黄肇宇,周兴文,等.不同保鲜剂对月季保鲜效果的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(03):104.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.03.0104]
TAN Ping,HUANG Zhao-yu,ZHOU Xing-wen,et al.Effect of Different Preservatives on Rosa Chinensis[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(08):104.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.03.0104]
[5]魏岚岚.不同玉米品种对盐胁迫的生理响应[J].黑龙江农业科学,2017,(03):27.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.03.0027]
WEI Lan-lan.Physiological Response of Different Maize Varieties to Salt Stress[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2017,(08):27.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.03.0027]
[6]王镭,张英杰,张京伟,等.月季组培快繁技术研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2019,(06):179.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2019.06.0179]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2019,(08):179.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2019.06.0179]
[7]何思思,戴子云,孙正海.刺天茄浸提液对“卡罗拉”月季瓶插效果的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021,(10):72.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.10.0072]
HE Si-si,DAI Zi-yun,SUN Zheng-hai.Effects of the Extract of Solanum indicum L.on the Bottle Insertion of ‘Corolla’ Rose[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(08):72.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.10.0072]
[8]田玉辉,张 奕,王 政,等.基于SBE法和逐步回归法的南阳月季展景观评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021,(11):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.11.0048]
TIAN Yu-hui,ZHANG Yi,WANG Zheng,et al.Landscape Evaluation of Nanyang Rose Exhibition Based on SBE and Stepwise Regression Method[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(08):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.11.0048]
[9]张凯泉,崔艳.盐胁迫对两种月季生理指标的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(11):45.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.11.0045]
ZHANG Kai-quan,CUI Yan.Effects of Salt Resistance on Physiological Indexes of Different Rose Varieties[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(08):45.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.11.0045]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2013-04-08
基金项目：深圳市城市管理局科技基金资助项目（SZCG201002）
第一作者简介：罗丹（1987-），女，黑龙江省双城市人，硕士，从事园林植物与观赏园艺研究。E-mail：523808208@163.com。
通讯作者：谢利娟（1971-），女，广东省深圳市人，硕士，教授，从事园林植物生理研究。E-mail：xlj328@yahoo.com.cn。