YAN Feng,LI Qing-quan.Evaluation of the Control Effects of Different Agents on Broomcorn Millet Smut[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(12):44-47.[doi:DOI:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.12.0044]
不同药剂对糜子黑穗病的防治效果评价
- Title:
- Evaluation of the Control Effects of Different Agents on Broomcorn Millet Smut
- Keywords:
- broomcorn millet; sumt; seed dressing with agents; control effect
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了筛选生产中防治糜子黑穗病的有效药剂，提高糜子生产效率，本试验先进行药剂拌种，播种后再进行菌土接种的方法，研究不同药剂对糜子黑穗病的防治效果。结果表明：不同药剂对糜子种子萌发和幼苗生长有不同程度的抑制作用，12.5%烯唑醇和30%苯醚甲环唑抑制作用明显，不适宜作为糜子黑穗病的防治药剂；其余药剂处理下，对糜子黑穗病防治效果在63.8%～94.4%，增产幅度在13.4%～39.2%。其中，70%甲基硫菌灵和43%戊唑醇在防病效果和产量上显著高于其他处理。在黑龙江省西部地区糜子生产上建议选用70%甲基硫菌灵和43%戊唑醇进行拌种防治糜子黑穗病。
- Abstract:
- In order to screen the effective fungicides for preventing and controlling the smut of broomcorn millet in production and improve the production efficiency of broomcorn millet,this experiment adopted the method of dressing seeds with fungicides first,and then inoculating bacteria soil after sowing to study the control effects of different fungicides on the smut of broomcorn millet.The results showed that different chemicals had different inhibitory effects on seed germination and seedling growth of millet,and 12.5% diniconazole and 30% anisole were more effective than other chemicals,which were not suitable for controlling millet smut.Under the treatment of other chemicals,the control effect of millet smut was 63.8%-94.4%,and the yield increased by 13.4%-39.2%.70% thiophanate-methyl and 43% tebuconazole were significantly higher than other treatments in disease control effect and yield.It is suggested that 70% thiophanate-methyl and 43% tebuconazole should be used for seed dressing to control smut of broomcorn millet in the western region of Heilongjiang Province.
参考文献/References:
［1］胡兴雨，陆平，贺建波,等.黍稷农艺性状的主成分分析与聚类分析[J].植物遗传资源学报，2008,9(4):492-496.[2]景小兰,李志华,董旭.不同播期对糜子不同品种生长发育及产量的影响[J].作物杂志,2019(1):146-151.[3]王恒亮,吴仁海,职倩倩,等.除草剂作用机制研究进展[J].河南农业科学，2013,42(12):11-15.[4]乔志军.糜子产业发展现状与思路[J].作物杂志,2013(5):25-27.[5]梁海燕,李海,杨如达,等.不同药剂对糜子黑穗病的防治效果[J].山西农业科学,2015,43(6):737-739.[6]柴岩.糜子[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.[7]史桂清,梁廷康,程树森,等.晋中地区小麦黑穗病流行原因和防治对策[J].山西农业科学,1996,24(1):59-60.[8]孙志超,刘文国,杨维国,等.吉林省玉米丝黑穗病研究进展及抗病品种选育[J].玉米科学,2007,15(2):130-132.[9]刘慧芬.高粱丝黑穗病的研究进展[J].国外农学:杂粮作物,1999,19(3):46-49.[10]刘佳佳,周瑜,张盼盼,等.防治糜子丝黑穗病的杀菌剂筛选及田间防治效果研究[J].草业学报,2016,25(9):132-141.[11]刘惕若.黑粉菌与黑粉病[M].北京:农业出版社,1984:382-386.[12]PHIPPS P M.Soybean and peanut seed treatment:New developments and needs［J］.Plant Disease，1984，68(1):76-77.[13]高志军,李涛,杨文耀,等.药剂拌种对糜子丝黑穗病的防效试验[J].安徽农学通报,2020,26(11):94-97.[14]王婉莹.糜子黑穗病防治药剂筛选试验总结[J].农业开发与装备,2013(4):48.[15]刘峰，慕卫，张文吉，等.杀菌剂对水稻旱育秧立枯病的控制作用及其对秧苗的生理效应[J].农药学学报，2004,6(2)：37-42.[16]王雅玲,杨代斌，袁会珠，等.低温胁迫下戊唑醇和苯醚甲环唑种子包衣对玉米种子出苗和幼苗的影响[J].农药学学报,2009,11(1):59-64.[17]南志标，葛高祖，李春杰.数种农药对蚕豆根腐病的田间防效[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):943-947.
相似文献/References:
[1]赵秀梅,李清泉,罗宝君,等.不同糜子品种对黑穗病抗性鉴定[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(05):62.
ZHAO Xiu mei,LI Qing quan,LUO Bao jun,et al.Resistance Identification of Different Miliaceum Varieties Against Smut[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(12):62.
[2]王宇先.半干旱区糜子前氮后移技术验证试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(04):43.
WANG Yu xian.Demonstration Test of N Ferticizer Applicated at Late Growth Stage for Millet in Semiarid Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(12):43.
[3]赵秀梅,李清泉,谭可菲,等.糜子田土壤处理除草剂安全性与药效筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(03):73.
ZHAO Xiu-mei,LI Qing-quan,TAN Ke-fei,et al.Safety and Efficacy Screening Tests of Herbicide in Millet Field Soil Treatment[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(12):73.
[4]王宇先,李清泉,刘玉涛,等.半干旱区不同施氮量对糜子产量及品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(03):24.
WANG Yu-xian,LI Qing-quan,LIU Yu-tao,et al.The Effect of Different Nitrogen Rates on Yield and Quality of Broomcorn Millet in Semi-arid Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(12):24.
[5]王宇先,李清泉,刘玉涛,等.不同播期对糜子生长发育及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(09):22.
WANG Yu-xian,LI Qing-quan,LIU Yu-tao,et al.The Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Growing Development of Panicum miliaceum L.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(12):22.
[6]刘 峰.糜子农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(03):15.
LIU Feng.Genetic Diversity Analysis of Broomcorn Millet Based on Agronomic Traitsbroomcorn millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(12):15.
[7]刘 峰,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.糜子新品种齐黍1号选育及栽培要点[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(06):166.
LIU Feng,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Breeding and Cultivation Main Points of New Broomcorn Millet Variety Qishu No.1[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(12):166.
[8]闫 锋,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.糜子主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(05):37.
YAN Feng,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis of Main Agronomic Character of Broomcorn Millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(12):37.
[9]王宇先.半干旱地区糜子倒伏系数相关及通径分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(07):31.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.07.0031]
WANG Yu-xian.Correlation and Path Analysis on Lodging Resistance of Millet in Semi-arid Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(12):31.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.07.0031]
[10]申忠宝,邸桂俐,李成权,等.高粱种衣剂研究初报[J].黑龙江农业科学,2007,(04):46.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2007.04.0046]
SHEN Zhong-bao,DI Gui-l i,LI Cheng-quan,et al.Study of Seed Coating on Sorghum[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2007,(12):46.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2007.04.0046]
[11]董扬,闫锋,赵富阳,等.不同微生物菌剂对糜子黑穗病田间防效[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023,(10):18.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.10.0018]
DONG Yang,YAN Feng,ZHAO Fuyang,et al.Control Effects of Different Microbial Agents on Broomcorn Millet Smut[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(12):18.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.10.0018]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2021-09-02