[1]周长军.雷达图法综合评价抗线虫大豆品种（系）农艺性状[J].黑龙江农业科学,2024,(07):6-11.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.07.0006]
　ZHOU Changjun.Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits of Nematode Resistant Soybean Varieties (Lines) by Radar Map Method[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2024,(07):6-11.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.07.0006]
点击复制

雷达图法综合评价抗线虫大豆品种（系）农艺性状

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2024年07 页码: 6-11 栏目: 出版日期: 2024-07-10
Title:
Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits of Nematode Resistant Soybean Varieties (Lines) by Radar Map Method
文章编号:
2
作者:
周长军
（黑龙江省农业科学院 大庆分院/国家大豆产业技术体系大庆综合试验站，黑龙江 大庆 163316）
Author(s):
ZHOU Changjun
(Daqing Branch，Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Daqing Comprehensive Test Station of National Soybean Industrial Technology System, Daqing 163316，China)
关键词:
雷达图分析法; 抗线虫大豆; 农艺性状; 综合评价
Keywords:
Radar map method;  nematode resistant soybean;  agronomic traits;  comprehensive assessment
DOI:
10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.07.0006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为筛选出综合性状优良的抗线虫大豆品种（系），以2020-2021年抗线虫大豆品种(系) 11个主要农艺性状的5点试验数据均值为评价指标，利用雷达图法进行综合评价分析。结果表明，百粒重最大、单株粒重最高、SCN指数与倒伏级别最低的品系为17-665，其综合评价和产量数据排名均为第1，说明该品系抗病性、抗倒性、丰产性较其他品种（系）突出；产量排名第2位（2020年）和第4位（2021年）的品系为17-555，因SCN指数偏高，单株粒重低，其他性状中等偏上，在综合评价分析中排名均较产量排名下降；而2年产量排名第8位的品系为17-474，倒伏级别最低，单株荚数、单株粒数及百粒重较高，综合性状较好，在综合评价分析中排名第3位（2020年）和第2位（2021年）；各农艺性状表现较差的品系17-388产量及综合评价排名均为第10位；对照品种齐农5号在2年5点试验中产量与综合评价排名较小，说明在不同年际间、不同试验地点齐农5号表现稳定，适宜作为黑龙江省大豆区域试验对照品种。
Abstract:
In order to screen out soybean varieties (lines) with excellent comprehensive characteristics and resistance to nematodes, and the 5-point experimental data mean of 11 main agronomic traits of nematode resistant soybean varieties (lines) from 2020 to 2021 were used as the evaluation index in this study. The Radar chart method was used for comprehensive evaluation analysis. The results showed that the line 17-665 with the highest 100-seed weight, the highest weight of single plant seed , and the lowest SCN index and lodging level ranked first in both comprehensive evaluation and yield data, indicating that its disease resistance, lodging resistance, and high yield were more prominent than other varieties (lines); The strain 17-555, ranked 2nd (2020) and 4th (2021) in terms of yield, had a relatively high SCN index, low weight of per plant seed, and other traits that were above average. In the comprehensive evaluation analysis, its ranking had decreased compared to the yield ranking; The strain 17-474, which ranks 8th in yield over a period of 2 years, had the lowest lodging level, higher number of pods per plant, seeds per plant, and 100-seed weight. It had good comprehensive traits and ranked 3rd (2020) and 2nd (2021) in comprehensive evaluation analysis; The strain 17-388 with poor performance in various agronomic traits ranked 10th in terms of yield and comprehensive evaluation; The yield and comprehensive evaluation ranking of the control variety Qinong 5 was relatively low in the 2-year 5-point experiment, indicating that Qinong 5 performed stably in different years and experimental locations, making it suitable as a regional trial control variety for soybean in Heilongjiang Province.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘冰,朱洪德,李肖白,等.不同种植密度对抗线虫大豆产量及品质的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(10):28.
　LIU Bing,ZHU Hong-de,LI Xiao-bai,et al.Effect of Different Densities on Yield and Quality of Resistant Nematode Soybean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(07):28.

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2023-11-30

基金项目：黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费项目(CZKYF2023-1-B004)；国家大豆产业技术体系大庆综合试验站 (CARS-04-CES07)。
作者简介：周长军（1977-），男，硕士，副研究员，从事大豆遗传育种与栽培研究。E-mail：andazhouchangjun@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-10