CEN Jiabao,WU Yan,XU Yanmei,et al.Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Content and Storage Distribution Characteristics of Three Forest Types in Guizhou Fragile Ecological Area[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2024,(06):57-63.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.06.0057]
贵州脆弱生态区三种森林类型土壤碳氮磷含量及储量分布特征
- Title:
- Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Content and Storage Distribution Characteristics of Three Forest Types in Guizhou Fragile Ecological Area
- 文章编号:
- 10
- Keywords:
- forest type; carbon; nitrogen and phosphorus content; carbon; nitrogen and phosphorus storage; fragile ecological region
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 探究不同森林类型的土壤养分贮存能力，以贵州喀斯特脆弱生态区3种森林类型（柳杉针叶林、枫香阔叶林及二者组成的针阔混交林）土壤为研究对象，分析不同森林类型土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷含量及储量的分布特征，并探讨土壤碳、氮、磷含量及储量与叶片、枯落物、腐殖质碳、氮、磷之间的耦合关系。结果表明，（1）针叶林土壤有机碳含量为26.51 g·kg-1、全氮含量为1.18 g·kg-1、全磷含量为0.44 g·kg-1；阔叶林土壤有机碳含量为22.95 g·kg-1、全氮含量为1.06 g·kg-1、全磷含量为0.39 g·kg-1；针阔混交林土壤有机碳含量为30.02 g·kg-1、全氮含量为1.17 g·kg-1、全磷含量为0.40 g·kg-1。针叶林土壤有机碳储量为48.62 t·hm-2、全氮储量为2.16 t·hm-2、全磷储量为0.81 t·hm-2；阔叶林土壤有机碳储量为48.13 t·hm-2、全氮储量为2.21 t·hm-2、全磷储量为0.84 t·hm-2；针阔混交林土壤有机碳储量为60.43 t·hm-2、全氮储量为2.37 t·hm-2、全磷储量为0.80 t·hm-2。（2）林型变化对土壤有机碳、全磷含量及有机碳储量存在显著影响，针阔混交林有机碳含量及储量均显著高于针叶林和阔叶林，而针叶林全磷含量显著高于阔叶林。（3）林型变化对全氮含量、全氮储量及全磷储量均无显著影响。（4）相关性分析结果表明，叶片、枯落物及腐殖质碳、氮、磷含量与土壤碳、氮、磷含量及储量之间均存在不同程度的相关关系。综上所述，研究区针阔混交林中有机碳含量及储量具有明显优势，而针叶林中全磷含量具有明显优势，叶片、枯落物及腐殖质养分与土壤养分存在不同程度的相关性。
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the soil nutrient storage capacity of different forest types, soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents and storage distribution characteristics of soil of three forest types (cryptomeria conifer forest, maple broadleaf forest and needle and broad mixed forest composed of the two forest types) were analyzed in Kast Fragile Ecological Region of Guizhou Province. The coupling relationship between soil C, N, P content and storage with leaf, litter, humus C, N, P were also discussed. The results showed that, (1) the soil C, N and P contents of the three forest types were as follows: organic carbon content of coniferous forest was 26.51 g·kg-1, total nitrogen content was 1.18 g·kg-1 and total phosphorus content was 0.44 g·kg-1; Broad-leaved forest: organic carbon content was 22.95 g·kg-1, total nitrogen content was 1.06 g·kg-1, total phosphorus content was 0.39 g·kg-1;needle and broad mixed forest: 30.02 g·kg-1, total nitrogen content was 1.17 g·kg-1, total phosphorus content was 0.40 g·kg-1. C, N and P reserves were as follws: organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus reserves of coniferous forest were 48.62, 2.16 and 0.81 t·ha-1, respectively. The organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus reserves of broad-leaved forest were 48.13, 2.21 and 0.84 t·ha-1respectively. The organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus reserves of needle and broad mixed forest were 60.43, 2.37 and 0.80 t·ha-1 respectively; (2) Forest type changes had significant effects on soil C and P contents and C reserves. The C content and C reserves of coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests were significantly higher than those of coniferous and broad-leaved forests, while the P content of coniferous forests was significantly higher than that of broad-leaved forests. (3) Forest type changes had no significant effects on N content, N reserves and P reserves. (4) Correlation results showed that the contents of C, N and P in leaves, litter and humus were correlated with the contents and reserves of C, N and P in soil to varying degrees. To sum up, in the study area, there were obvious advantages in C content and storage in the mixed needle-wide forest, and obvious advantages in P content in the coniferous forest, and there were different degrees of correlation between leaf, litter and humus nutrients and soil nutrients.
参考文献/References:
［1］勾啸,张蒙,李海滨.广东莲花山不同海拔梯度下森林土壤养分和化学计量特征[J].林业与环境科学,2019,35(3):82-86.[br/][2]宋娅丽,康峰峰,韩海荣,等.自然因子对中国森林土壤碳储量的影响分析[J].世界林业研究,2015,28(3):6-12.[br/][3]许窕孜,邹祖有,叶彩红,等.江门市3种亚热带林分类型土壤碳氮磷储量分布特征[J].林业与环境科学,2022(3):34-38.[br/][4]ELSER J J, STERNER R W, GOROKHOVA E, et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3(6): 540-550. [br/][5]王维奇,徐玲琳,曾从盛,等.河口湿地植物活体-枯落物-土壤的碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):134-139.[br/][6]FAN H B, WU J P, LIU W F, et al. Linkages of plant and soil C∶N∶P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations[J]. Plant and Soil, 2015, 392(1): 127-138. [br/][7]曾晨阳,武燕,丁波,等.贵州脆弱生态区3种森林恢复模式土壤层水源涵养能力研究[J].安徽农学通报,2023,29(9):95-99.[br/][8]曹建华,袁道先,章程,等.受地质条件制约的中国西南岩溶生态系统[J].地球与环境,2004,32(1):1-8.[br/][9]谭玮颐,冉洁,张乔艳.贵州省国有扎佐林场植被覆盖度动态变化研究[J].南方农机,2021,52(14):76-78.〖ZK)〗[br/][10]罗梅,杨守禄,唐红祥,等.1963—2018年贵州修文县气温和降水变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):177-181,187.[br/][11]陈梦圆.修文县种植食用百合气候适应性分析[J].农业与技术,2015,35(15):101-102.[br/][12]顾雪君.贵州省修文猕猴桃产业的发展现状与营销对策[J].农家参谋,2017(20):34.[br/][13]杨伏虎.扎佐林场森林资源管护中的问题及应对措施[J].现代园艺,2019(9):187-188.[br/][14]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.[br/][15]董雪,辛智鸣,黄雅茹,等.乌兰布和沙漠典型灌木群落土壤化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(17):6247-6256.[br/][16]俞月凤,何铁光,曾成城,等.喀斯特区不同退化程度植被群落植物-凋落物-土壤-微生物生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2022,42(3):935-946.[br/][17]李明军,喻理飞,杜明凤,等.不同林龄杉木人工林植物-凋落叶-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征及互作关系[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7772-7781.[br/][18]曹娟,闫文德,项文化,等.湖南会同3个林龄杉木人工林土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J].林业科学,2015,51(7):1-8.[br/][19]喻林华,方晰,项文化,等.亚热带4种林分类型枯落物层和土壤层的碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].林业科学,2016,52(10):10-21.[br/][20]姜沛沛,曹扬,陈云明.陕西省森林群落乔灌草叶片和凋落物C、N、P生态化学计量特征[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(2):365-372.[br/][21]曾昭霞,王克林,刘孝利,等.桂西北喀斯特森林植物-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2015,39(7):682-693.[br/][22]陶玉华,向达永,郭耆,等.柳州市三种人工林土壤有机碳储量的空间分布[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51(10):1990-1993.[br/][23]兰斯安,杜虎,曾馥平,等.不同林龄杉木人工林碳储量及其分配格局[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1125-1134.[br/][24]周玉荣,于振良,赵士洞.我国主要森林生态系统碳贮量和碳平衡[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(5):518-522.[br/][25]王卫霞,史作民,罗达,等.我国南亚热带几种人工林生态系统碳氮储量[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):925-933.[br/][26]SCHULP C J, NABUURS G J, VERBURG P H, et al. Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256(3): 482-490. [br/][27]OSTONEN I, LHMUS K, PAJUSTE K. Fine root biomass, production and its proportion of NPP in a fertile middle-aged Norway spruce forest: Comparison of soil core and ingrowth core methods[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 212(1/2/3): 264-277. [br/][28]王瑞璋,黎建强,杨关吕,等.磨盘山典型森林生态系统土壤营养元素储量及其价值量评估[J].西部林业科学,2019,48(6):93-99.[br/][29]石燕,武燕,王娑娑,等.不同龄组马尾松人工林土壤表层与团聚体碳氮磷储量变化[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023(5):57-61.[br/][30]ZENG Z Q, WANG S L, ZHANG C M, et al. Carbon storage in evergreen broad-leaf forests in mid-subtropical region of China at four succession stages[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2013, 24(4): 677-682. [br/][31]张亚冰,吕文强,易武英,等.贵州月亮山5种森林类型土壤生态化学计量特征研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2016,24(6):617-625.[br/][32]张雨鉴,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.滇中亚高山5种林型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(1):73-82.[br/][33]何高迅,王越,彭淑娴,等.滇中退化山地不同植被恢复下土壤碳氮磷储量与生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4425-4435.[br/][34]弓文艳,陈丽华,郑学良.基于不同林分类型下土壤碳氮储量垂直分布[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):152-157,164.[br/][35]彭素琴,刘郁林,刘苑秋,等.针叶林补阔对土壤有机碳、氮含量的影响[J].赣南师范大学学报,2022,43(3):97-102.[br/][36]秦娟,孔海燕,刘华.马尾松不同林型土壤C、N、P、K的化学计量特征[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(2):68-76,82.[br/][37]樊后保,李燕燕,黄玉梓,等.马尾松纯林改造成针阔混交林后土壤化学性质的变化[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):77-81.[br/][38]徐丽,何念鹏.中国森林生态系统氮储量分配特征及其影响因素[J].中国科学:地球科学,2020,50(10):1374-1385.[br/][39]李青桦,张玉,林玉瑄,等.西南地区不同林型凋落物-土壤氮、磷含量分布特征[J].四川农业大学学报,2021,39(3):341-347.[br/][40]张泰东,王传宽,张全智.帽儿山5种林型土壤碳氮磷化学计量关系的垂直变化[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(10):3135-3143.[br/][41]肖华翠,李靖雯,夏允,等.中亚热带不同母质发育森林土壤磷组分特征及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):16-22.[br/][42]宾振钧,王静静,张文鹏,等.氮肥添加对青藏高原高寒草甸6个群落优势种生态化学计量学特征的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(3):231-237.[br/][43]GHOLZ H L, WEDIN D A, SMITHERMAN S M, et al. Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition[J]. Global Change Biology, 2000, 6(7): 751-765. [br/][44]聂兰琴,吴琴,尧波,等.鄱阳湖湿地优势植物叶片-凋落物-土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(7):1898-1906.[br/]
相似文献/References:
[1]陈明义.玉溪东风水库主要森林类型水源涵养功能综合评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(09):132.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0132]
CHEN Ming-yi.Comprehensive Evaluation on Water Conservation Function of Main Stand Typesin Yuxi Dongfeng Reservoir[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(06):132.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0132]
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2024-03-20