[1]刘丽滨,解艳萍,杨威,等.莠去津胁迫对不同抗性谷子生理生化指标的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(03):43-48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.03.0043]
　LIU Li-bin,XIE Yan-ping,YANG Wei,et al.Effects of Atrazine Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Setaria italica L.with Different Atrazine Resistance[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(03):43-48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.03.0043]
点击复制

莠去津胁迫对不同抗性谷子生理生化指标的影响

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2022年03 页码: 43-48 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-03-10
Title:
Effects of Atrazine Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Setaria italica L.with Different Atrazine Resistance
作者:
刘丽滨; 解艳萍; 杨威; 冯艳飞; 王雨婷; 王帝; 孙丽芳
黑龙江八一农垦大学 农学院，黑龙江 大庆 163319
Author(s):
LIU Li-bin; XIE Yan-ping; YANG Wei; FENG Yan-fei; WANG Yu-ting; WANG Di; SUN Li-fang
College of Agriculture,Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University,Daqing 163319，China
关键词:
谷子; 莠去津; 生理生化指标; 抗性品种; 敏感品种
Keywords:
Setaria italica L.; atrazine; physiological and biochemical indexes; resistant variety; sensitive variety
DOI:
10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.03.0043
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为进一步验证萌芽期筛选的抗/感莠去津谷子品种公矮2号和龙谷31的抗耐性，本试验观察了莠去津胁迫下谷子幼苗生长情况，并测定了莠去津胁迫下谷子幼苗叶片和根的抗氧化保护酶活性(POD、SOD)、可溶性蛋白、脯氨酸、丙二醛(MDA)含量的变化。结果表明：莠去津胁迫下，敏感品种（龙谷31）和抗性品种（公矮2号）幼苗生长均受到抑制；其他各项生理生化指标含量均与对照相比具有显著差异，其中龙谷31 叶片中MDA和渗透调节物质含量增量均高于公矮2号，而保护酶活性则低于公矮2号。综合分析，莠去津胁迫下，抗性品种公矮2号能够维持较高的抗氧化保护酶活性，叶片积累较少的MDA，可以较好地缓解莠去津对谷子幼苗的伤害，使植物体内维持正常的各种代谢活动。
Abstract:
In order to further verify the atrazine resistant/susceptible millet varieties Gongai 2 and Longgu 31,the growth of seedling was observed,and the activity of antioxidant protective enzyme activities (POD and SOD) and the contents of soluble protein,proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) in leaves and roots of millet seedlings under atrazine stress were determined in this study.The results showed that under atrazine stress,the inhibition degree of seedling growth indexes of sensitive variety (Longgu 31) and resistant variety (Gongai 2)were all great; the contents of other physiological and biochemical indexes were significantly different from the control,in which the increment of MDA and osmoregulation substances in Longgu 31 leaves were higher than Gongai 2,while the activity of protective enzyme was lower than Gongai 2.Comprehensive analysis showed that under atrazine stress,resistant variety Gongai 2 could maintain high antioxidant protective enzyme activity and accumulate less MDA in leaves,which could better alleviate the damage of atrazine to millet seedlings,so as to maintain normal metabolic activities in plants.

参考文献/References:

参考文献：

［1］王军.莠去津对土壤微生物群落结构及分子多样性的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2012.

［2］化工部农药信息总站.国外农药品种手册[M].北京:化工部农药信息总站出版社,1996:754-785.

［3］刘长令.世界农药大全:除草剂卷[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:382-383.

［4］胡笑形,罗笑敏,陈净,等.农药手册上册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2015:44-45.

［5］赵滨,卢宗志.莠去津在吉林省的应用和残留现状调查[J].东北农业科学,2018,43(3):28-31.

［6］MCMURRY J,SUMANEK E.有机化学基础[M].6版.北京:清华大学出版社,2008:231-232.

［7］除草剂莠去津的优缺点及科学使用[J].现代农药,2021,20(1):25.

［8］KARLSSON A S,WEIHERMLLER L,TAPPE W,et al.Field scale boscalid residues and dissipation half-life estimation in a sandy soil[J].Chemosphere,2016,145:163-173.［9］MOYER J R,BLACKSHAW R E.Effect of soil moisture on atrazine and cyanazine persistence and injury to subsequent cereal crops in southern Alberta[J].Weed technology,1993,7(4):988-994.

［10］CONTRERAS M B C,CAMACHO J V,FERNANDEZ-MORALES F J,et al.Biodegradability improvement and toxicity reduction of soil washing effluents polluted with atrazine by means of electrochemical pre-treatment:Influence of the anode material[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,255:109895.1-109895.7.

［11］王庆海,李翠,陈超,等.芦苇对阿特拉津胁迫的生理响应及其与耐受性的关系[J].农业环境科学学报,2017(10):1968-1977.

［12］陈乐,赵莹莹,王媛媛,等.细菌SnebYK诱导大豆抗阿特拉津的效果评价[J].中国油料作物学报,2014,36(5):641-647.

［13］ZHANG Y,JIANG D,YANG C,et al.The oxidative stress caused by atrazine in root exudation of Pennisetum americanum(L.) K.Schum[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,211(7)：111943.

［14］王淼.玉米除草剂烟嘧·莠去津对紫花苜蓿出苗、生长及产量的影响[D].长春:东北师范大学,2020.

［15］王锦,陈雅琳,刘丹竹,等.玉米田残留除草剂对后茬大豆苗期药害的研究[J].大豆科技,2016（5）:23-26.

［16］胡海波,郝永丽,高博,等.莠去津缓解剂对马铃薯药害的缓释效果[J].北方农业学报,2018,46(6):93-96.

［17］杨彩宏,冯莉,田兴山,等.莠去津土壤残留对四种蔬菜的光化学和生长的影响[C]//中国植物保护学会杂草学分会.第十二届全国杂草科学大会论文摘要集,2015:99-100.

［18］李志江,马金丰,李延东,等.东北春谷区今年来谷子育成品种的评价[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(23):4507-4516.

［19］李会霞,刘红,王玉文,等.谷子抗除草剂杂交种去除假杂种技术研究[J].作物杂志,2021（6）:72-77.

［20］吴仁海,职倩倩,魏红梅,等.谷子苗期除草剂及其安全剂筛选[J].农药,2017,56(9):685-687.

［21］张清航,张永涛.植物体内丙二醛(MDA)含量对干旱的响应[J].林业勘查设计,2019（1）:110-112.

［22］陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2002:117-118.

［23］王晶英,敖红,张杰,等.植物生理生化实验技术与原理[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,2003:7．

［24］张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:123-124.

［25］李玲.植物生理学模块实验指导[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:97-98.

［26］曲敏,秦丽楠,刘羽佳,等.两种检测SOD酶活性方法的比较[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2014,5(10):3318-3323.

［27］邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

［28］吕双雪,栾非时,朱子成,等.莠去津和拿捕净对西瓜种子萌发及相关酶活性的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2018,31(9):17-21.

［29］王雨婷,苗兴芬,王帝.萌发期耐莠去津谷子种质资源筛选及评价[J].作物杂志,2021（5）:194-204.

［30］吴艳兵,颜振敏,王建华,等.48%莠去津可湿性粉剂对不同玉米品种的安全性研究[J].广东农业科学,2009（12）:117-120.

［31］杨婷.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害[J].科技与创新,2018(8):61-62.

［32］朱诗苗,宋杭霖,张丽,等.铅胁迫对烟草生长及生理生化指标的影响[J].植物生理学报,2018(3):465-472.

［33］郑钢,顾翠花,王杰,等.干旱胁迫对黄薇光合特性和若干生理生化指标的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2021,33(9):1650-1659.

［34］李聪聪,李乃光,吴正锋.高温干旱复合胁迫对花生幼苗生理指标的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2021,43(5):906-913.

［35］ZHANG J J,ZHOU Z S,SONG J B,et al.Molecular dissection of atrazine-responsive transcriptome and gene networks in rice by high-throughput sequencing[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2012,219:57-68.

［36］张涛,马肖静,朱新红,等.NaCl胁迫对不同耐盐性辣椒幼苗生理生化指标的影响[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(12):38-43.

［37］SHIMABUKURO R H,SWANSON H R,WALSH W C.Glutathione conjugation:Atrazine detoxication mechanism in corn[J].Plant Physiology,1970,46(1):103-107.

［38］林金利,程春园,谢沛丰,等.甜玉米自交系耐铝毒的初步筛选[J].湖北农业科学,2020,59(11):19-24.

［39］马玉玲.干旱胁迫及复水对大豆活性氧清除系统的影响[D].哈尔滨：东北农业大学,2018.

［40］许健,于海林,王宇先,等.苗期玉米对PEG-6000胁迫的生理响应[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021（8）:8-11.

［41］吕伟,任果香,韩俊梅,等.干旱胁迫对芝麻幼苗生理生化指标的影响[J].作物杂志,2021(5):172-175.

［42］ISAYENKOV S V,MAATHUIS F J M.Plant salinity stress:Many unanswered questions remain[J/OL].Frontiers in Plant Science,2019:10［2021-10-11］.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00080.

［43］秦立刚,李雪,李韦瑶,等.PEG干旱胁迫对3种葱属植物种子萌发期渗透调节物质及酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(1):72-79.

［44］刘兵,贾旭梅,朱祖雷,等.盐碱胁迫对垂丝海棠光合作用及渗透调节物质的影响[J].西北植物学报,2019,39(9):1618-1626.

［45］黄伟超,范宇博,王泳超.低温胁迫对玉米幼苗抗氧化系统及渗透调节物质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(24):6-12.

［46］宋晓玲.干旱-高温交叉逆境下小麦活性氧代谢及蛋白质含量和组分的变化[D].西安:西北农林科技大学,2012.

［47］李小玲,韩洁,侯瑶,等.干旱高温互作下高山杜鹃幼苗生理生化变化研究[J].江西农业学报,2019,31(5):17-22.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨慧莹,刘玉涛,王宇先,等.谷子精量穴播高产栽培及精深加工前景[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(07):32.
　YANG Hui-ying,LIU Yu-tao,WANG Yu-xian,et al.High-yield Cultivated of Precision Sow with Dibbleand the Prospects for Deep Processing of Millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(03):32.
[2]李志江,李延东,马金丰,等.谷子抗“拿捕净”基因的SSR标记[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(07):5.
　LI Zhi-jiang,LI Yan-dong,MA Jin-feng,et al.SSR Marker of the Gene Conferring Sethoxydim Resistance in Setaria italica (L.)Beauv.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(03):5.
[3]邢宝龙,朱玉.晋北地区谷子生产关键技术研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2011,(03):39.
　XING Bao-long,ZHU Yu.Study on Key Technique of Foxtail Millet Productionin North Region of Shanxi[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2011,(03):39.
[4]崔兴国,时丽冉.盐胁迫对不同品种谷子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2011,(06):14.
　CUI Xing-guo,SHI Li-ran.Effect of Salt Stress on Different Seed Germination and SeedlingGrowth of Setaria italica(L.)[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2011,(03):14.
[5]闫 锋.黑龙江省晚熟谷子种质资源的灰色关联度分析及综合评价[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(07):30.
　YAN Feng.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Serotinous Millet Germplasm Resources in Heilongjiang Province[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):30.
[6]曾玲玲,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.红小豆主要农艺性状的遗传参数分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(09):115.
　ZENG Ling-ling,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Genetic Parameters Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits in Adzuki Bean[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):115.
[7]闫 锋,崔秀辉,李清泉,等.谷子主要农艺性状的遗传参数分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(03):28.
　YAN Feng,CUI Xiu-hui,LI Qing-quan,et al.Genetic Parameters Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits in Millet[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):28.
[8]田广龙.朝阳地区谷子产业开发现状及发展对策[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,(12):162.
　TIAN Guang-long.Development Situation and Countermeasures ofMillet Industrial in Chaoyang District[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2010,(03):162.
[9]王小军,吴 阳,孟国栋.谷子品种比较试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014,(12):4.
　WANG Xiao-jun,WU Yang,MENG Guo-dong.Comparative Tests of Setaria italic[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2014,(03):4.
[10]张晓娟,王晓军,杨军学,等.优质高产谷子品种引进鉴选试验研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2015,(10):14.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.10.0014]
　ZHANG Xiao-juan,WANG Xiao-jun,YANG Jun-xue,et al.Experimental Study on High Yield Varieties of Millet Introduction Identification and Selection[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2015,(03):14.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2015.10.0014]
[11]曹晓宁,王君杰,刘思辰,等.不同浓度莠去津对谷子田间杂草的防除效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(07):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.07.0048]
　CAO Xiao-ning,WANG Jun-jie,LIU Si-chen,et al.Control Effect of Different Concentrations of Herbicide Atrazine on Weed in Foxtail Millet Field[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(03):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.07.0048]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2021-12-10

基金项目：黑龙江八一农垦大学创新创业项目（XC2019018）；黑龙江省博士后科研启动项目（LBH-Q18101）；黑龙江省重点研发项目（GA21B009-5）。

第一作者：刘丽滨（1998-），男，硕士研究生，从事作物遗传育种研究。E-mail:1151542823@qq.com。

通信作者：孙丽芳（1981-），女，博士，副教授，从事作物遗传育种研究。E-mail:sunlifang2013@126.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-04