[1]郎 博,胡 强,许 泉,等.微生物肥料宁盾与农药的兼容性[J].黑龙江农业科学,2017,(03):78-83.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.03.0078]
　LANG Bo,HU Qiang,XU Quan,et al.Compatibility of Microbial Fertilizer “Nanjing Shield” and Pesticides[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2017,(03):78-83.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.03.0078]
点击复制

微生物肥料宁盾与农药的兼容性

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2017年03期 页码: 78-83 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-03-10
Title:
Compatibility of Microbial Fertilizer “Nanjing Shield” and Pesticides
文章编号:
1002-2767（2017）03-007806
作者:
郎 博1; 胡 强1; 许 泉2; 付 鹏3; 郭坚华1
1.南京农业大学 植物保护学院/农作物生物灾害综合治理教育部重点实验室/江苏省生物源农药工程中心，江苏 南京 210095；2.南京农业大学 资源与环境科学学院，江苏 南京 210095；3.南京农业大学 植物保护学院，江苏 南京 210095
Author(s):
LANG Bo; HU Qiang; XU Quan; GUO Jianhua
1.College of Plant Protection,Nanjing Agricultural University,Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests,Ministry of Education,Engineering Center of Bioresource Pesticide in Jiangsu Province,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210095;2.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences，Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210095；3.College of Plant Protection,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210095
关键词:
微生物菌剂; 宁盾; 化学农药; 兼容性
Keywords:
microbial fertilizer;  Nanjing shield;  compatibility;  pesticides
分类号:
S144;S482
DOI:
10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2017.03.0078
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了使宁盾能够更好的得到示范推广，对当前农民常用的47种农药与微生物肥料宁盾的兼容性进行了评估。结果表明：嘧霉胺、氟啶胺、氟菌肟菌酯、咪鲜胺、病毒K、多抗菌素和病毒立克在某一浓度内与宁盾兼容性较好，但随着浓度的改变会抑制宁盾的活菌数；艾敌达和吗胍乙酸铜在任何浓度下都与宁盾的兼容性一般；甲霜灵锰锌、腐霉利、甲霜霜霉威、醚菌酯、井冈霉素、生石灰、氟乐灵、印楝素、霉止在任何浓度下与宁盾的兼容性都较差；建议甲霜霜霉威、井冈霉素、印楝素、咪鲜胺、嘧霉胺、吗胍乙酸铜可以在其使用10 d后使用宁盾；氟啶胺可以在其使用15 d后对作物使用宁盾；甲霜灵锰锌、醚菌酯可以在其使用30 d后对作物使用宁盾，腐霉利、氟乐灵、氟菌肟菌酯不建议将其与宁盾复配使用。生石灰可以在与土壤混拌后再使用宁盾，艾敌达和吗胍乙酸铜可以与宁盾进行复配使用。由此说明多种农药都可与宁盾配合使用，而且使农药的使用效率提高。
Abstract:
In order to more better promote microbial fertilizer “Nanjing shieid”,the compatibility of microbial fertilizer “Nanjing Shield” and 47 kinds of pesticides that the farmer often used was determined.The results showed that pyrimethanil,fluazinam,trifloxystrobin,prochloraz,more antibiotics,virus pavlik and virus K in some concertration have a good compatibility; but with the change of the concentration will had inhibitory effect on it.The moroxydine hydrochloride and MSharQ with the “Nanjing Shield” at all concertration had a general compatibility.The bacteria with metalaxylmancozeb,procymidone,metalaxyl and propamocarb,kresoximmethyl,validamycin,quicklime,trifluralin,azadirachtin and mould check at all concertration had a bad compatibility.The metalaxyl and propamocarb,validamycin,azadirachtin,prochloraz,pyrimethanil and moroxydine hydro chloride could be used before the “Nanjing Shield” about 10 days.The fluazinam could be used before the “Nanjing Shield” about 15 days.The metalaxyl mancozeb and kresoximmethyl could be used before the “Nanjing Shield” about 30 days.The procymidone,trifluralin and trifloxystrobin could’t be used with “Nanjing Shield”.The quicklime could be used after mixed with soil.The MSharQ and moroxydine hydrochloride could be used with “Nanjing Shield”.Through the experiment,it was found that a variety of pesticides were used in conjunction with “Nanjing Shield”,improve the use efficiency of pesticides.

参考文献/References:

[1]宋仲容,高志强,何家洪,等.农药研究现状及应用评述[J].农机化研究,2007(7):10-13.
[2] 黎植昌.农药的现状和发展[J].四川化工,1995(3):28-30.
[3] Kland M J.Chapter 8 teratogenicity of pesticides and other environmental pollutants [J].Stud.Environ.Sci.,1988,31:315-463．
[4] Kavlock R J,Daston G P,Derosa C,et al.Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S.EPAsponsored workshop.[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,1996,104(4):715-740.
[5] 龚平.多效唑的土壤微生物生态效应[J].环境科学,1996（4）:36-38，92.
[6] 胡晓,张敏.有机磷农药对土壤微生物群落的影响[J].西南农业学报,2008(2):384-389.
[7] 张巨勇.化学农药的危害及我国应采取的对策[J].云南环境科学,2004(2):23-26.[8] 司马依?萨依木.农药的危害与微生物农药的开发[J].化学教育,2002(11):1-3.
[9] 林玉锁,龚瑞忠.农药环境管理与污染控制[J].环境导报,2000(3):4-6.
[10] Gunnell D,Eddleston M,Phillips M R,et al.The global distribution of fatal pesticide selfpoiso Nanjing: systematic review[J].BMC public health,2007,7(1):357.
[11] Leach A W,Mumford J D.Pesticide environmental accounting:a method for assessing the external costs of individual pesticide applications[J].Environmental pollution,2008,151(1): 139-147.
[12] Müller H,Westendorf C,Leitner E,et al.Quorum sensing effects in the antagonistic rhizosphere bacterium Serratiaply muthic a HROC 48[J].FEMS Microbiol Eco，2009，l67:468-467.
[13] Katan J,Ginzburg C,Freeman S.The weakeNanjing effect as a trigger for biological control and criteria for its evaluation[M]//Biological control of plant diseases.US：Springer,1992: 55-61.
[14] 鹿秀云,李社增,高胜国,等.5种化学杀菌剂对枯草芽孢杆菌NCD2菌体及芽孢的影响[J].植物病理学报,2005,35(6):173-175.
[15] 陈志谊,任海英.戊唑醇和枯草芽孢杆菌协同作用防治蚕豆枯萎病及增效机理初探[J].农药学学报,2002,4(4):40-44.
[16] 张盈.杀菌剂氟吡菌酰胺对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[D].长沙：湖南农业大学,2013.

相似文献/References:

[1]王瑶,王宏燕,赵伟.微生物菌剂对玉米秸秆堆肥的作用效果研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013,(08):28.
　WANG Yao,WANG Hong-yan,ZHAO Wei.The Effect Inoculating Microbes on Composting of Maize Stover[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2013,(03):28.
[2]刘巍,王峥,冷伟峰,等.功能性微生物菌剂对花生根际微生物种群的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2020,(06):98.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.06.0098]
　[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2020,(03):98.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.06.0098]
[3]罗金谣,艾沙江?买买提,玉苏甫?阿不力提甫,等.喷施微生物菌剂对核桃农艺性状、品质及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021,(06):28.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.06.0028]
　[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(03):28.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.06.0028]
[4]张茂明,顾鑫,杨晓贺,等.水稻三段式高产化控施肥技术研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021,(09):33.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.09.0033]
　ZHANG Mao-ming,GU Xin,YANG Xiao-he,et al.Study on Three Stage High Yield Chemical Controlled Fertilization Technology of Rice[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2021,(03):33.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2021.09.0033]
[5]徐雅欣,杨丽,赵倩,等.壳聚糖及微生物菌剂对枇杷幼苗光合及抗性生理的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(12):33.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.12.0033]
　XU Ya-xin,YANG Li,ZHAO Qian,et al.Effects of Chitosan and Microbial Agents on Photosynthesis and Resistance Physiology of Loquat Seedlings[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(03):33.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.12.0033]
[6]闫锋,董扬,赵富阳,等.不同微生物菌剂对糜子生长及土壤酶活性的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023,(05):35.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.05.0035]
　YAN Feng,DONG Yang,ZHAO Fuyang,et al.Effects of Different Microbial Agents on Growth of Broomcorn Millet and Enzyme Activities of Soil[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(03):35.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.05.0035]
[7]杨慧莹,王宇先,徐莹莹,等.两种微生物菌剂对工业大麻田中大麻螟的防治效果[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023,(05):45.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.05.0045]
　YANG Huiying,WANG Yuxian,XU Yingying,et al.Field Control Effect of Two Microbial Inoculum Against Grapholita delineana[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(03):45.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.05.0045]
[8]马凤捷,杨春胤,宿翠翠,等.蚯蚓粪和微生物菌剂互作对蜜瓜生长和土壤养分的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023,(09):25.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.09.0025]
　MA Fengjie,YANG Chunyin,SU Cuicui,et al.Effects of Interaction Between Vermicompost and Microbial Agents on Growth of Honey Dew Melon and Soil Nutrients[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(03):25.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.09.0025]
[9]董扬,闫锋,赵富阳,等.不同微生物菌剂对糜子黑穗病田间防效[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023,(10):18.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.10.0018]
　DONG Yang,YAN Feng,ZHAO Fuyang,et al.Control Effects of Different Microbial Agents on Broomcorn Millet Smut[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(03):18.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.10.0018]
[10]李濛池,惠霖,黄修梅,等.高寒黑土区不同微生物菌剂对马铃薯产量和疮痂病防治效果的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2023,(12):28.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.12.0028]
　LI Mengchi,HUI Lin,HUANG Xiumei,et al.Effects of Different Microbial Agents on Potato Yield and Control Effect of Scab Disease in High Latitude Cold Black Soil Regions[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2023,(03):28.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2023.12.0028]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2016.02.28基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新资金资助项目（CX（15）1044）；江苏省自然科学基金资助项目（BE2015364）；江苏省产学研联合创新资金资助项目（BY201507104）第一作者简介：郎博（1996-），山西省晋中市人，在读学士，从事植物保护研究。 E-mail:707415587@qq.com。通讯作者：付鹏（1965-），女，硕士，副研究员，从事植物病害生物防治等方面研究。E-mail:fupeng@njau.edu.cn。

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-06