HE Jia-qi,ZHANG Dong-xue,YIN Jun-mei,et al.Effects of Different Preserve Methods on Physiological Indexes in Leaves of Dendrobium spp.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(09):72-76.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0072]
不同保存方法对秋石斛叶片抗寒生理指标的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Different Preserve Methods on Physiological Indexes in Leaves of Dendrobium spp.
- 文章编号:
- 1002-2767(2016)09-0072-04
- Keywords:
- leaves of Dendrobium; temperature; physiological indexes
- 分类号:
- S567.239
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为探讨样品的保存对其生理指标测定的影响,以秋石斛088叶片为材料,分别测定叶片和提取液在4、-20、-70 ℃条件下保存1、2、3 d时的可溶性蛋白、叶绿素、MDA(丙二醛)及Fpro(游离脯氨酸)等4个生理指标的变化情况,研究不同生理指标测定适合的样品保存条件和时间。结果表明:叶片样品中可溶性蛋白含量随着保存时间的延长而逐渐下降,其中-70 ℃保存1 d时含量与鲜叶相近;叶绿素含量则随着保存时间的延长呈现先上升后下降然后趋于稳定,各温度条件下叶片和提取液的叶绿素含量均在保存2 d后与对鲜叶相近;MDA的含量在不同温度及时间保存处理间存在轻微的波动,但差异不显著;FPro的含量在不同温度下均随保存时间的延长均呈现骤然上升然后下降并趋于稳定,其中以提取液-20 ℃保存2 d时与鲜叶最为接近。
- Abstract:
- In order to discuss the effect of suitable condition and time of the sample preservation on different physiological indexes,using leaves of Dendrobium spp.as experiment materials which were treated in 4,-20 and -70 ℃ under 1,2 and 3 days for leaf or extracting solution,the contents of soluble protein,chlorophyll,malondialdehyde and free proline were measured.The results showed that as preservation time extension,the content of soluble protein decrease,and the leaf saving in -70 ℃ for 1 day was most similar with control group.The contents of chlorophyll was first increased and then decreased finally stable with the prolonging of the storage time.And the content saving as leaf or extracting solution in -70 ℃ for 2 days was most similar with control group under treatment temperature.There was a slight fluctuation in the content of MDA in different temperature or time treatments,but the difference was not significant.As preservation time extension,the content of free proline showed a sudden rise then decrease and finally stability at different temperatures treatment,and the extracting solution saving in -70 ℃ for 2 days was most similar with control group.
参考文献/References:
[1] 卢思聪 . 热带洋兰秋石斛 ( 上 )[J]. 中国花卉盆景 ,2003(9): 4-5.
[2]陈泰教,何平荣,符岸军.海南设施石斛兰的栽培管理技术[J].2009(6): 54-55.
[3]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[4]罗军武,唐和平,黄意欢.茶树不同抗寒性品种间保护酶类活性的差异[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2001,27(2):94-96.
[5]郭爱华,陈钮钰,姚月俊.自然降温对不同杏品种1年生枝条抗寒性的影响[J].山西林业科技,2007(1):33-34.
[6]王子飞,熊源新,罗睿.不同植物叶片保存方法对色素降解的影响[J].贵州科学,2013,31(2): 65-68.
[7]孙骏威,杨勇,蒋德安.水分亏缺下水稻的光化学和抗氧化应答[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2004,30(3):278-284.
[8]戴高兴,彭克勤,萧浪涛,等.聚乙二醇模拟干旱对耐低钾水稻幼苗丙二醛、脯氨酸含量和超氧化物歧化酶活性的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2006,20(5): 557-559.
[9]Liang Y C,Hu F,Yang M C,et al .Antioxidative defenses and water deficit-induced oxidative damage in rice (Oryza sativa L.) growing on non-flooded paddy soils with ground mulching[J].Plant and Soil,2003,257(2): 407-416.〖ZK)〗
[10]〖ZK(#〗蒋靓,庄杰云,樊叶杨,等.与水稻耐逆性相关的叶片丙二醛含量的QTL分析[J] .中国水稻科学,2007,21(4):436-438 .
[11]章秀福,王丹英,储开富,等.镉胁迫下水稻SOD活性和MDA含量的变化及其基因型差异[J] .中国水稻科学,2006,20(2):194-198.
[12]潘晓华,刘水英,李锋,等.低磷胁迫对不同水稻品种叶片膜脂过氧化及保护酶活性的影响[J] .中国水稻科学,2003,17(1):57-60.
[13]冯绪猛,罗时石,胡建伟.农药对水稻叶片丙二醛及叶绿素含量的影响[J] .核农学报,2003,17(6):481-484.
[14]易俗,王瑞兰,汪琼,等.铀尾沙胁迫对水稻幼苗叶绿素含量、MDA含量和SOD活性的影响[J].作物学报,2004,30(6):626-628.
[15]李合生.现代植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
[16]王荣富.植物抗寒指标的种类及其应用[J].植物生理学通讯,1987(3):49-55.
[17]李美如,刘鸿先,王以柔.植物细胞中的抗寒物质及其与植物抗冷性的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,1995,3l(5):328-334.
[18]陈发河,张维一.低温胁迫对甜椒果实游离脯氨酸的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1991,27(5): 365-368.
[19]冯建灿,张玉洁,杨天柱.低温胁迫对喜树幼苗SOD活性MDA和脯氨酸含量的影响[J].林业科学研究,2002,15(2):197-202.备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-06-12
基金项目:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(1630032014014);海南省自然科学基金面上资助项目(20163131)
第一作者简介:何嘉琦(1992-),女,海南省海口市人,在读硕士,从事植物抗逆生理研究。E-mail:hjqzmjcc@163.com。
通讯作者:陆顺教(1981-),男,博士,助理研究员,从事生物技术及分子生物学研究。E-mail:lushunjiao@sina.com。