FENG Hui-wen,ZHANG Xiu-fang.Control Effect Evaluation of Nine Kinds of Fungicide Combinations Against Potato Late Blight[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(09):60-62.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0060]
九种药剂组配防治马铃薯晚疫病防效评价
- Title:
- Control Effect Evaluation of Nine Kinds of Fungicide Combinations Against Potato Late Blight
- 文章编号:
- 1002-2767(2016)09-0060-03
- 分类号:
- S435.32
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为高效、低残留地防治马铃薯晚疫病,进行了9种药剂组配防治马铃薯晚疫病的药效试验。结果表明:处理B[80%乙蒜素EC+80%代森锰锌WP+(80%乙蒜素EC+80%代森锰锌WP混配)]对马铃薯晚疫病的防治效果最好,其次是C[80%乙蒜素EC+80%代森锰锌WP+(80%乙蒜素EC+50%多菌灵WP混配)]和K[58%甲霜灵·锰锌WP+58%甲霜灵?锰锌WP+58%甲霜灵?锰锌WP],防治效果分别为81.54%、74.66%、71.27%。折合单产最高的是处理B,为31 303.95 kg·hm-2,其次是处理C和K,为24 363.60 kg·hm-2、23 525.25 kg·hm-2。1%水平上,处理B表现极显著。马铃薯晚疫病常发区要防治3次以上,前期使用保护剂,后期用治疗剂,效果较为理想。
- Abstract:
- In order to prevent potato late blight with high efficiency and low residue,field experiments for nine kinds of fungicide combinations against potato late blight were conducted.The results showed that the control effect of the treatment B[80% Ethylicin EC+80% Mancozeb WP+ (80% Ethylicin EC+80% Mancozeb WP mixture)] against potato late blight was the best,followed by the treatment C[80% Ethylicin EC+80% Mancozeb WP+ (80% Ethylicin EC+50% Carbendazim WP mixture)] and the treatment K[58% Maganese Zinc WP +58% Maganese Zinc WP+58% Maganese Zinc WP].The control effects were 81.54%,74.66% and 71.27% respectively.The yield of B was the highest,31 303.95 kg·hm-2,followed by C and K,24 363.60 kg·hm-2,23 525.25 kg·hm-2.At 1% level,there was significant difference between B and CK.Potato late blight should be prevented more than thrice where the disease often occurred.In the early part of the disease,protective agent was used,and in the late part of the disease,therapeutic agent was used,the effect of which was more ideal.
参考文献/References:
[1]
郭成瑾
,
张丽荣
,
沈瑞清
,
等
.
几种进口杀菌剂对马铃薯晚疫病防治效果的研究
[J].
中国马铃薯
,2009,23(1):26-27
. [2]谢瑞礼,赵镜慧,李维群,等.八种杀菌剂对马铃薯晚疫病的防治效果[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(7):1382-1385. [3]王长魁,王多.不同杀菌剂对马铃薯晚疫病防治效果及经济效益分析[J].中国马铃薯,2009,23(5):290-292. [4]李春晓,韦相贤,陈小梅,等.几种杀菌剂对“黑美人”彩色马铃薯晚疫病的化学防治[J].中国马铃薯,2009,23(6):349-351.
相似文献/References:
[1]阎世霞. 马铃薯晚疫病的综合防治[J].黑龙江农业科学,1992,(02):50.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1992.02.0050]
[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,1992,(09):50.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1992.02.0050]
[2]王仁贵,刘丽华,夏平,等. 利用甲霜灵颗粒剂防治马铃薯晚疫病的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,1994,(05):22.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1994.05.0022]
Wang Ren gui,Liu Lihua,Xia Ping.[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,1994,(09):22.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.1994.05.0022]
[3]徐晓东,李广忠,李玲丽,等.克无踪催枯防治马铃薯晚疫病[J].黑龙江农业科学,2001,(03):51.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2001.03.0051]
XU Xiao-dong,LI Guang-zhong,LI Ling-li,et al.Control of phytophthora infestans Bary by Accelerating Potato Dry with Paraquat[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2001,(09):51.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2001.03.0051]
[4]赵滨.氟啶胺和氰霜唑对马铃薯晚疫病防治效果及产量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2018,(04):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2018.04.0048]
ZHAO Bin.Effects of Fluazinam and Cyazofamid on Control Efficiency of Potato Late Blight and Yield of Potato[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2018,(09):48.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2018.04.0048]
[5]刘洋,赵秀梅,郑旭,等.马铃薯晚疫病对甲霜灵和精甲霜灵抗药性的田间药效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(06):53.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.06.0053]
LIU Yang,ZHAO Xiu-mei,ZHENG Xu,et al.Field Efficacy Test of Potato Late Blight Resistance to Metalaxyl and Metalaxyl-M[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(09):53.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.06.0053]
[6]夏善勇,牛志敏,李庆全,等.马铃薯晚疫病致病疫霉菌遗传多样性及防治研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(12):89.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.12.0089]
XIA Shan-yong,NIU Zhi-min,Li Qing-quan,et al.Research Progress on Genetic Diversity of Phytophthora infestans in Potato Late Blight and Its Control[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(09):89.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.12.0089]
[7]师正浩.28%唑嘧菌胺·氟吡菌胺悬浮剂防治马铃薯晚疫病田间药效试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2024,(05):44.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.05.0044]
SHI Zhenghao.Field Efficacy Test of 28% Ametoctradin · Fluopicolide Suspension Against Potato Late Blight[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2024,(09):44.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2024.05.0044]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-07-16