[1]张术伟,常春艳,王卓然,等.黄河三角洲不同盐度壤土表层水盐关系研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022,(07):43-48，49.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.07.0043]
　ZHANG Shu-wei,CHANG Chun-yan,WANG Zhuo-ran,et al.Study on Surface Water-Salt Relationship of Loam with Different Salinities in Yellow River Delta[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2022,(07):43-48，49.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.07.0043]
点击复制

黄河三角洲不同盐度壤土表层水盐关系研究

《黑龙江农业科学》[ISSN:1002-2767/CN:23-1204/S] 卷: 期数: 2022年07 页码: 43-48，49 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-07-10
Title:
Study on Surface Water-Salt Relationship of Loam with Different Salinities in Yellow River Delta
作者:
张术伟; 常春艳; 王卓然; 高鹏; 赵庚星
山东农业大学 资源与环境学院/土肥高效利用国家工程研究中心，山东 泰安 271018
Author(s):
ZHANG Shu-wei; CHANG Chun-yan; WANG Zhuo-ran; GAO Peng ; ZHAO Geng-xing
College of Resources and Environment,Shandong Agricultural University/National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient of Soil and Fertilizer Resources,Tai′an 271018,China
关键词:
土壤盐渍化; 电导率; 土壤含水率; 土壤含盐量; 线性关系
Keywords:
soil salinization;  electrical conductivity;  soil moisture;  soil salinity;  linear relationship
DOI:
10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2022.07.0043
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为防治黄河三角洲土壤次生盐渍化，通过配制轻度、中度、重度盐渍化程度的壤质土体，进行土壤水盐关系试验，利用经典统计分析、线性回归分析、Origin图表分析等方法，探讨了在加水升盐、淋水降盐、蒸发返盐过程中土壤水盐之间的相互关系，在此基础上，通过测算土体田间持水量估算了大田降盐灌水参数。结果表明，（1）升盐过程中，土壤表层水盐呈现正向线性关系，含水率的增加对含盐量较高的土体影响较显著，高水高盐环境下的水盐相关性高于低水低盐环境下的水盐相关性；（2）降盐过程中，土壤表层水盐呈现负向线性关系，达到田间持水量后再注入2%的水时，各土体内盐分下降的幅度最大，随后趋于平缓；（3）当体积含水率达到20%时，土体达到田间持水量，每667 m2农田灌入约6.6 m3水时，中度盐渍化土降为轻度盐渍化；灌入约7.8 m3水时，重度盐渍化土降为轻度盐渍化；（4）自然蒸发情况下，重度盐渍土体返盐速率明显快于中度盐渍土。
Abstract:
In order to prevent soil secondary salinization,in the Yellow River Delta,this paper prepared loam soil with mild,moderate and severe salinization,and carried out the experiment of soil water-salt relationship,the relationship between soil water and salt in the process of adding water to raise salt,pouring water to lower salt and evaporating back salt was discussed by using the methods of classical statistical analysis,regression analysis analysis and Origin chart analysis,the field water holding capacity of soil was calculated and converted into field water holding capacity,and the parameters of salt-reducing irrigation were estimated.The results showed that:(1) In the process of salt rising,there was a positive linear relationship between water and salt in the surface layer of soil,and the increase of water content had a significant effect on the soil with higher salt content,the water-salt correlation in the high water and high salt environment was higher than that in the low water and low salt environment; (2) The water-salt correlation in the soil surface showed a negative linear relationship in the process of salt reduction; (3) When the volume water content reached 20%,the soil reached the field water holding capacity,which was converted to about 6.6 m3 water per 667 m2 farmland,the moderately salinized soil becomed slightly salinized;when about 7.8 m3 of water was injected,the severely salinized soil was reduced to slightly salinized soil;(4) Under the condition of natural evaporation,the rate of return salinization of heavy salinized soil was obviously faster than that of moderate salinized soil.

参考文献/References:

［1］贺文君,韩广轩,颜坤,等.微地形对滨海盐碱地土壤水盐分布和植物生物量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3585-3597.

[2]李小倩,夏江宝,赵西梅,等.不同潜水埋深下浅层土壤的水盐分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(2):43-50.
[3]肖泽岸,赖远明.冻融和干湿循环下盐渍土水盐迁移规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(S1):3738-3746.
[4]辛玉琛.仪器法在田间持水量测定中的应用[J].中国防汛抗旱,2019,29(9):38-41.
[5]HANDSON B R,KAITA K.Response of electromagnetic conductivity meter to soil salinity and soil-water content[J].Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,1997,123(2):141-143.[6]KURTULU C,YEKEN T,DURDA D.Estimating the soil water content using electrical conductivity,oven method and speedy moisture tester[J].Eurasian Soil Science,2019,52(12):1577-1582.[7]李瑛,龚晓南,郭彪,等.电渗软黏土电导率特性及其导电机制研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(S2):4027-4032.
[8]罗战友,陶燕丽,周建,等.杭州淤泥质土的电渗电导率特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(S1):3222-3228.
[9]朱伟,杨劲松,姚荣江,等.黄河三角洲中重度盐渍土棉田水盐运移规律研究[J].土壤,2021,53(4):817-825.
[10]胡琴,陈为峰,宋希亮,等.不同灌水量对黄河三角洲盐碱地改良效果研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):305-310，325.
[11]尹春艳,陈小兵,刘虎,等.不同淋洗条件下黄河三角洲盐渍土脱盐规律研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(3):76-82.
[12]刘洪光,白振涛,李开明.基于HYDRUS-2D模型的膜下滴灌暗管排水棉田土壤盐分变化[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(2):130-141.
[13]王曼华,陈为峰,宋希亮,等.秸秆双层覆盖对盐碱地水盐运动影响初步研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(6):1395-1403.
[14]许静.不同试验方法测定田间持水量的对比研究[D].长春：吉林大学,2018.
[15]王卓然,赵庚星,高明秀,等.黄河三角洲垦利县夏季土壤水盐空间变异及土壤盐分微域特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(4):1040-1049.
[16]崔昆,赵庚星,王卓然,等.黄河三角洲夏季典型田块土壤盐分的多尺度空间变异[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(5):1451-1458.
[17]梁飞.如何利用田间持水量和土壤容重确定滴灌作物一亩地的最大灌溉量？[EB/OL].(2020-03-03)[2022-02-10].https://www.huahuibk.com/view/44312.html.
[18]李志华.季节性冻融期盐渍土水热盐耦合关系研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2011.
[19]孙宇瑞.土壤含水率和盐分对土壤电导率的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2000(4):39-41.
[20]徐志闻,刘亚斌,胡夏嵩,等.基于水分和原位电导率的西宁盆地盐渍土含盐量估算模型[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(5):148-154.
[21]张晶,党建友,张定一,等.节水灌溉方式与磷钾肥减施对小麦产量、品质及水肥利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):166-171.
[22]罗雪园,周宏飞,柴晨好,等.不同淋洗模式下干旱区盐渍土改良效果分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(2):322-326.
[23]薛新伟,杨恒山,张瑞富,等.滴灌对半干旱地区土壤水盐运动和次生盐渍化影响的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2019,35,539(32):89-94.
[24]陈丽娟,冯起,王昱,等.微咸水灌溉条件下含黏土夹层土壤的水盐运移规律[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(8):44-51.
[25]钟诚,张军保,韩晓明,等.不同土壤质地田间持水量实验成果分析[J].东北水利水电,2014,32(5):65-67.
[26]窦旭,史海滨,李瑞平,等.暗管排水条件下春灌定额对土壤水盐运移规律的影响[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(10):318-328.
[27]张万锋,杨树青,靳亚红,等.秸秆深埋下灌水量对土壤水盐分布与夏玉米产量的影响[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(1):228-237.
[28]王卓然,赵庚星,高明秀,等.黄河三角洲典型地区春季土壤水盐空间分异特征研究——以垦利县为例[J].农业资源与环境学报,2015,32(2):154-161.
[29]尹春艳.黄河三角洲滨海盐渍土水盐运移特征与调控技术研究[D].烟台：中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所,2017.
[30]李明,宁立波,卢天梅.土壤盐渍化地区地下水临界深度确定及其水位调控[J].灌溉排水学报,2015,34(5):46-50.
[31]张国祥,申丽霞,郭云梅.微润灌溉条件下土壤质地对水分入渗的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(7):35-39.
[32]邹桂梅,黄明勇,苏德荣,等.蒸发条件下不同地下水位夹砂层土壤水盐运移特性研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(11):206-211.
[33]王婧,逄焕成,任天志,等.地膜覆盖与秸秆深埋对河套灌区盐渍土水盐运动的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(15):52-59.
[34]赵永敢,王婧,李玉义,等.秸秆隔层与地膜覆盖有效抑制潜水蒸发和土壤返盐[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(23):109-117.
[35]仲昭易,张瑜,冯绍元,等.秸秆深埋结合地膜覆盖土壤水盐运移模拟试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(6):25-30.
[36]赵文举,马宏,豆品鑫,等.不同覆盖模式下土壤返盐及水盐运移规律[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(5):210-214.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘万达.寒地苹果抗寒性研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2012,(12):86.
　LIU Wan-da.Cold Resistance Research of Apple in Cold Region[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2012,(07):86.
[2]王春艳.水稻耐寒壮苗伴侣的研制与应用[J].黑龙江农业科学,2002,(02):23.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2002.02.0023]
　WANG Chun-yan.Study and Application of Cold -tolerant and Healthy Seedling Powder of Rice[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2002,(07):23.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2002.02.0023]
[3]李亮,高明波,袁海洋,等.耐冷玉米自交系的筛选[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(07):4.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.07.0004]
　LI Liang,GAO Ming-bo,YUAN Hai-yang,et al.Screening of Cold Tolerance Maize Inbred Lines[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(07):4.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.07.0004]
[4]李玉舒,邹原东.低温胁迫对木槿电导率和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016,(09):82.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0082]
　LI Yu-shu,ZOU Yuan-dong.Effect of Low Temperature Stress on Electrical Conductivity and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Hibiscus syriacus [J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2016,(07):82.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0082]
[5]李津立.天津园林绿化土壤及灌溉水全盐量测定质量法和电导法的数理统计关系[J].黑龙江农业科学,2020,(02):81.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.02.0081]
[6]陈曦,刘志洋.低温胁迫下六种萱草的抗寒性比较[J].黑龙江农业科学,2020,(05):7.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.05.0007]
　CHEN Xi,LIU Zhi-yang.Comparison on Cold Resistance of Six Hemerocallis Under Low Temperature Stress[J].HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,2020,(07):7.[doi:10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2020.05.0007]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2022-04-12

基金项目：国家自然科学基金（41877003）；山东省重大科技创新工程项目（2019JZZY010724）；山东省“双一流”奖补资金（SYL2017XTTD02）。
第一作者：张术伟（1998-），女，硕士研究生，从事土地资源与信息研究。E-mail：zsw00019@163.com。
通信作者：赵庚星（1964-），男，博士，教授，博导，从事土地资源遥感及信息技术应用研究。E-mail：zhaogx@sdau.edu.cn。

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-02